Answer:
A. An inquiring mind and suspension of belief is the correct answer.
Explanation:
- Professional skepticism is an inquiring mind that includes critical evaluation, questioning, and staying alert to situations that may indicate possible error because of fraud and mismanagement and also an important evaluation of audit data.
- The elements of professional skepticism are questioning mind, autonomy, suspension of knowledge,interpersonal judgment, search for information, and self-esteem.
- Professional skepticism performs an important role in the audit and we need professional skepticism to maintain an audit of the expectation.
Answer:
This question is incomplete, here are the missing answers:
<em>a. medium of exchange</em>
<em>b. unit of account</em>
<em>c. backed by a precious metal</em>
<em>d. store of value</em>
<u>The answer is </u><u>c.</u>
Explanation:
Money has three general functions (characteristics):
- <em>medium of exchange</em> - Mainly created as the substitute of barter, money has the elementary use as an intermediary when exchanging goods or services.
- <em>unit of account</em> - In order to compare the value of certain goods and services, it is essential to measure them. This is where money applies as unit of account.
- <em>store of value </em>- Given that the money is stable (purchasing power and limited inflation), it is a general option for storing value. That means it can always be easily exchanged into goods or services, no matter the time.
According to basic elimination, <u>c. is the correct answer</u>. Also, it is also known that <em>backing money with gold</em> or silver reserves is an old practice which is irrelevant for most currencies nowadays. Today, the government is backing up the value of its currency. Such money is called <em>fiat money</em>.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "Production process " Any process that comes ito physical contact with the product that will be delivered to an external customer is <span>Production process </span>
The biggest losers in that case were the tax payers.
Under the <span> institutional treasury management case, it involved the frauding of millions of dollars that is hidden from a certain investment account.
If not being fraud ,These millions of dollar should've resulted in about 40% tax rate that will be used by the government for the benefit of the taxpayers in the form of welfare or other infrastructures</span>
