Answer:
A
Explanation:
Property rights define the theoretical and legal ownership of resources and how they can be used. These resources can be both tangible or intangible and can be owned by individuals, businesses, and governments.
Random website i found on the internet 0_0
Answer: what is the story
Explanation: story?
The Supreme Court case that upheld the right to counsel for defendants in criminal cases was Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966). Hence, the correct statement is option C.
<h3>What happened in the case of Wainwright and Arizona?</h3>
In this case, the Supreme Court declared that the Fourteenth Amendment creates a right for criminal defendants who cannot pay for their own lawyers to have state-appointed attorneys on their behalf.
The missing information is given below:
A. Baker v. Carr (1962) and Engel v. Vitale (1962)
B. Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) and Roe v. Wade (1973)
C. Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
D. Mapp v. Ohio (1961) and Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964)
Hence, The Supreme Court case that upheld the right to counsel for defendants in criminal cases was Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966). the correct statement is option C.
learn more about case of Wainwright and Arizona:
brainly.com/question/10320938
#SPJ1
Answer:
B. Put less work in, get more work out
Explanation:
Efficiency means that you want to maximize something with putting little in. With this, the only answer that would make sense would be B.
If you were to put more work in and get less work out that would not be efficient at all. It would be the complete opposite.
If you were to put less work in and get less work out that is still inefficient.
If you put more work in and get more work out that could appear as efficient, but you are still putting in a lot of work which is not efficient.
Thus the best answer would be B. Put less work in, get more work out.
Hope this helps!! Ask questions if you need!
