The right answer is iron.
Let me explain: During the Civil War, the Confederacy wanted to acquire modern armored ships, therefore, gaining advantage over their adversaries. Somewhere around 1861, the Confederate Congress purchased ships called 'ironclads' from overseas, and a few moths later, they started working on constructing and converting their wooden ships to ironclads, by coating the sides of their ships with iron.
The goal behind this new defense strategy was to make it more difficult for heavy artillery to pierce the ships, thus gaining a new naval advantage over the enemy.
I hope this answer helps! Have a great week :)
Answer:
To say the least, the pros are: Taoism represents and reflects a view of the world and nature.
Taoism represents a view of life that also allows for other schools of thought to be used simultaneously.
It can be used by Legal analysts and as well as Confucians.
Schools of thought from around the world and from different nationalities know of it and its importance.
Taoism encourages self-knowledge and reflection.
Taoism provided a counter-balance to the organization of Confucianism.
Taoism devoted its energies to reflection and introspection so the natural principles that governed the world could be clearly understood.
However, the cons are that it undermines the power of most governments, since its beliefs are that nature is the ruling power. Taoism also caused the Yellow Turban Rebellion, which decreased the power of the government in Zhou, China.
But then again, the Dao or Tao refers to "the way of nature" or "the way of the universe" and so that stands in direct opposition to the majority of government rules throughout the world in some way or another. But for those who respect nature and believes that nature is the ruling authority, Taoism would be the ideal religion to follow.
Explanation:
Answer:
In Katz v. USA (1967), the most important Fourth Amendment case, the defendant was sentenced by a federal court for illegal gambling. He organized them using a long-distance telephone, which was the crime against federal law. The judge admitted evidence to the trial in the form of telephone recordings of the accused received by the FBI agents. They installed eavesdropping equipment outside the telephone booth with which the accused called while committing a crime. The Supreme Court rejected the conviction.
Despite the fact that in the Katz case, the Court emphasized the protection of a person’s private life, rather than premises, it made one reservation: “The Fourth Amendment should not be construed as a basis for the adoption of a common “right to privacy.”
The decision in the Katz case is of great importance also for another reason. Judge Harlan, who joined the majority opinion, defined the criteria subsequently used by the courts to establish a violation or non-violation of the Fourth Amendment as a result of specific actions by the authorities. This criterion is called “reasonable expectation of privacy.” The criterion is based on two premises: first, a person must show a valid (subjective) expectation of respect for the right to privacy; secondly, this expectation must be of such a kind that society can recognize it as "reasonable."
Explanation:
Answer:
Country people living in Western Europe
Explanation:
The difference between the Vietnam War and the Korean war was that the Vietnam war was an utter defeat for the American soldiers at the time and that they were devastated that they didn't conquer anything nor prevented communism from spreading while the Korean War ended with a stalemate where the North and the South signed a temporary peace agreement.
