There are multiple ways of comparing and contrasting structures that each have different implications and dangers.
1. The back-and-forth method, in which every other sentence compares and contrasts. ie:
P1- theme
-p1 Book A is blah, whereas Book B is blah.
P2- theme
-p2 Book A is blah.... you get the point,
The danger of this method is sounding too redundant, although it does a good job of focusing on the themes.
2. The separate, mixed theme method, in which an entire paragraph is dedicated to each subject, but the themes are thus mixed up within those paragraphs. This method is less redundant but runs the risk of losing clarity of theme.
3. The compare vs. contrast method. This one is fairly straightforward: A paragraph comparing, a paragraph contrasting, and one of synthesis at the end. The pros: It's playing it safe, and it'll work. The cons: It's boring.
Combinations of these 3 methods work as well, it all depends on your personal writing style and the subjects you're comparing.
Good luck
The answer is B<em>.Darkness </em>is a very much used resource for creating suspense.Apart from that, there is also the mentioning of the feeling <em>unease.</em>This sample of language connected to darkness creates a sense of suspense as you do not know what it is going to happen next and besides , as a reader you are also in the dark.
The sentence that should be added to the end of the paragraph is: A. The people who call the monster "Frankenstein" are probably those who have never read the book.
<h3>Content of the Conclusion</h3>
The content of the conclusive part of the paragraph should emphasize the name of the creature. Recall that there are two possible names of the monster.
The last paragraph could stress the usage of the name in modern times.
Learn more about Frankenstein here:
brainly.com/question/21437674
Answer: Probably false, it depends.
Explanation: Wikipedia can be edited by anyone which means that a person who is uncredible can write it which makes it have a chance that the article is giving misinformation. Sometimes, the articles are good. I would go to another site if you don't like to take chances.
