Answer:
Extravagant hypothesis.
Explanation:
Fallacies represent the error/flaw in reasoning that spoils the validity of the argument. An extravagant hypothesis is a kind of fallacy that occurs when an exaggerated or unlikely explanation or comparison is provided unnecessarily where a simpler or less elaborate description could work more efficiently. <em>Similarly, this example proposes an extravagant comparison(with 'aliens') that represents a flaw in logical reasoning(comparison here) </em>that neglects the effectiveness of the intended meaning. Thus, it exemplifies the 'extravagant hypothesis' fallacy.
Question 1: Against
Question 2: Maybe where they’re located not sure!
Question 3: Profit
Question 4: Either hundreds or thousands
Question 5: Either To help with understanding meaning or to help with all of the above
Answer:C.
Explanation:
To show what Kahlo had to overcome.
Hi !!
The conclusion to Damian's argument is positive as he is aware of what the problem still is the second one ===>
-
EXPLANATION
<u>He cannot say</u><u> </u>:
1- it's absurd that we have this problem when there is such an easy solution, <em>because he wants things to change</em>
<u>He knows that </u>:
1- Unfortunately, more 100 million plastic grocery bags are still being thrown away every year.
2- Although attempts have been made to recycle these plastic bags, the problem cause by them still exists.
So it's conclusion is that we have to change ►
<u>We need</u> to take active steps and change <u>our habits</u> by using reusable bags instead.
hope this helps ☺☺☺
