Natural rights are the unalienable rights every person is born with which the government cannot take away. It is the basis of the individual rights presented into the constitution and strongly based on the work of the philosophes in the European Renaissance.
Answer:
I DONT KNOW, AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Explanation:
Yes as long as it's constitutional. If it is against the constitution then no.
The environment was better in the West Indies than in the English mainland colonies.
Sugar cane requires a hot tropical climate to grow and also needs a high number of workers who can tolerate the conditions.
The English mainland colonies ranged from current day Maine to Georgia, north to south, and the Atlantic coast to the Appalachian Mountains (east to west). In none of these areas was the weather warm enough for a long enough period of time to grow the sugar cane crop. The West Indies are in the Caribbean and their location provided the warm, tropical environment. Indigenous peoples were first used to work the crop but they were too familiar with the land and not all with the crop. African slaves were brought to the Caribbean to farm the sugar cane because they could tolerate the weather and were familiar with the crop.
The correct answer is D. Both limit the number of people that exercise.
Explanation:
In oligarchy and monarchy, the number of people that hold power is limited. Indeed, in monarchy, the power is mainly exerted by the king/queen or monarch. Moreover, this power is passed to the heir, who is usually the son/daughter of the monarch.
Similarly, in an oligarchy, citizens do not hold power, but this is exerted by a small group of people, who are part of a dominant social class and exert power according to their interests. This means in monarchy power is exercised by one individual, while in aristocracy the power is exercised by a few privileged people. According to this, one difference is that "both limit the number of people that exercise".
