I guess the answer is that the church leaders began selling them as a way of raising money
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Alexander Hamilton belonged to the Federalist Party, which supported the idea of a strong central government. He thought that the federal government should be able to keep a strong army and navy, to raise taxes, and to have good relations with Great Britain.
James Madison was on the opposite side. He was a member of the Democratic-Republican Party. This party favored a weak central government, and favored state and local power.
The biggest rift between Hamilton and Madison came when the issue of a federal bank came up in Congress. Hamilton wanted to create a Central Bank to take on the debts of the states, and to fund future programs and armies, Madison, as anti-federalist, naturally opposed this idea. 
This rift was solved with the Compromise of 1790. The southerners, including James Madison, agreed to the creation of a national bank in exchange for having the new capital in southern territory (Washington D.C.).
 
        
             
        
        
        
For the Federalists, their <u>most likely response</u> is D. They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.
<h3>Who were the Federalists?</h3>
The Federalists were American Founding Fathers who wanted a strong government and strong executive branch.
The Federalists were opposed by the anti-Federalists who wanted a weaker central government. 
The Federalists did not vote for a bill of rights because they regarded the constitution as sufficient, unlike the anti-Federalists who demanded a bill of rights to be part of the Constitution.
Thus, for the Federalists, their <u>most likely response</u> is D. They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.
Learn more about Federalists and Anti-Federalists at brainly.com/question/267094
#SPJ1
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The first amendment
Explanation:
The Sedition and Alien acts was a limitation of press freedom and it was also against the freedom of speech.
People could face imprisonment or be fined for talking against or criticizing the president, congress and the government of the united states.
The VA resolutions (Virginia and Kentucky) condemned this act because it was a violation of free speech as contained in the first Amendment of the constitution. Therefore making it unconstitutional
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
If the government had supported unions instead of management in the late 19th century, Labor relations more peaceful; larger unions; higher wages; safer working conditions; lower profits.
Explanation: