Answer:
Hi
It meant a political situation among the states in which none of them achieved a power superior to the others. It is an idea of the late Middle Ages, applied to major or minor geographic regions that comprise the plurality of sovereign territories. Throughout Europe there is a legitimate feeling, always subject to interpretation, whereby any action required the confirmation of the rest of the States, the most significant case being the invasion of a territory. In this way the doctrine of just war was reached, to the problem of to what extent and to what extent the actual or imminent engraving of a State could mean a warlike justification. Transactions between contestants, neutral or rival, never ended, hence the relevance of diplomacy, as the concepts of balance, neutrality, freedom of Europe or sovereignty are interpreted continuously, while being used in conversations. Some thought of equilibrium as a natural system, because it was a consequence of international relations, and when a great power had too much force it threatened the others, and therefore, had to counteract the disproportion. Others considered it a desired goal for which he had fought.
In the rest of the world this balance of powers is characterized by the profusion of dictatorial or authoritarian regimes that have dominated the political scene and that have influenced the future of their peoples. A second point is the emergence of serious and bloody war conflicts, by territorial issues, which is not explained very well both in its unleashing and in its results, as consequences of the mere quantification of the powers faced. In all these, both in its gestation and its consequences, the role it plays in the character, personal ambitions and strategic conceptions of the leaders or rulers who govern the destinies of the countries involved appears with particular relevance.
Explanation:
Answer:
Monopolist profit maximizing price
A: $3 per gallon , total output =270 Kelvins profit = $810(801/7/2 = $405
Maria's profit = $405
B. $2.5 per gallon . Kelvin's profit =$450 Maria's profit = 337.5
C = False. At the same quantity , fall in price brings fall in revenue
Cournot Nash equilibrium
Explanation:
In a monopolist market system , price are set higher than the marginal cost as the producer enjoy the dominance of the market through the production of a unique good.
At the price of $3 , change in demand =(270-225) =45 , change in revenue = ($810-$787.50)22.5 and marginal revenue = (45/22,5) = 0.5. That forms the maximizing price for a monopolist.
On the new arrangement , price drops to $2.5 , Maria's profit =(315-45/2)2.5 = $337.5 and Kelvin's = ($787.5-337.5) = $450
Cournot Nash equilibrium is business model that explains the competition among rival companies producing similar product on the level of output produced independently.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>If there is a major problem in a country that leads to the rapid withdrawal of foreign investment, this is known as International financial crisis
</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The financial crisis was mainly brought about by deregulation in the budgetary business. That allowed banks to participate in support investments exchanging with subordinates. Banks, at that point, requested more home loans to help the productive clearance of these subordinates. They made intrigue credits that got moderate to subprime borrowers.
Big banks had the assets to become modern at the utilization of these convoluted subordinates. The money with the most muddled monetary items got the most cash flow.
Answer:
The correct answer is 842.1 Pesos and 941.18 Pesos.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Price of Jeans = $80
So, if exchange rate is $0.095 = 1 pesos
Then pesos required to buy that jeans can be calculated as follows:
Pesos required = $80 ÷ $0.095
= 842.1 Pesos
And if 1 Pesos = $0.085, then
Pesos required = $80 ÷ $0.085
= 941.18 Pesos
