Totalitarian Propaganda can controlled well educated people by conveying the regimes beliefs, almost forcing it down their subjects throats.
So when it works it usually shows an "Evil" or "Enemy" of the state, and obviously without proper methods of evaluating the truth decent people will believe it for example look at the DPRK or Iran.
Answer:
as supportive and nonjudgmenta
Explanation:
The hints we get form the text are " approved tolerance for others", and "inclined to help rather than to reprove". From this, we can assume he's not bitter and unforgiving. We don't have any textual evidence for cheerful, independent, or adventurous. So we can assume that he's as supportive and nonjudgmental.
I would say A because the first sentence is comparing the two sports while the second sentence is contrasting the two sports. Hope this helps!
Answer:
1. It is wrong (false).
2. It is wrong (false).
3. It is correct (true).
4. It is wrong (false).
5. It is correct (true).
Part B.
1. Polite.
2. Hard-working.
3. Dishonest.
4. Honest.
5. Lazy.
6. Rude.
Explanation:
1. A man who is not sure of himself is self-confident. .... It is wrong.
A man who is self-confident is sure of himself.
2. A man who is always polite is tactless. .... It is wrong.
A man who is always rude is tactless.
3. A man who thinks only of himself is selfish. .... It is correct.
4. A man who likes to live in a city is a suburban man. .... It is wrong.
A man who likes to live in a city is an urban man.
5. A man who easily loses control of himself is very touchy..... It is correct.
Part B.
1. Polite: You can say this about a person who says "please" and "thank you".
2. Hard-working: You can say this about a person who always works much.
3. Dishonest: Someone who lies or steals.
4. Honest: Someone who never lies or steals.
5. Lazy: Someone who doesn't like to work.
6. Rude: Someone who is not polite.
Answer:
is this a statement or a question?
Explanation:
there's no question mark, and the way you worded it is really strange.
