Antifederalist saw the Constitution as a way for the Federalist to gain more control over the states. This was seen as the opposite for the Federalist Party because they just wanted to create a central government that was strong enough to run the whole country. The Antifederalist Party was totally against the ratification because they were afraid that the national government would become too powerful and take advantage of their power. The Federalist Party was for the Constitution because they saw it as a way for the people to get more involved in the government since the most powerful branch would be directly linked to the people. Lastly, the Antifederalists saw the Constitution as a way to take the power of the states away while the Federalists interpreted the Constitution as a way for the states and the national government to have similar powers that still allow the national government to handle national affairs rather than having the states do it.
Answer:
It has been 155 years. Slavery was abolished in the year 1865.
The holy roman empire was a empire that crossed around the Mediterranean sea.The holy roman empire conquered many lands such as spain africa and parts of asia. The name of the empire originated when the empire of the holy roman empire named Charlemagne was crowned in a Catholic church after this he allowed the church to have come government controls after this the roman empire would be named the holy roman empire since of the chruches Persuasion over laws.hope this helps.
I believe the answer is:B. <span>citizens have basic rights that government must safeguard, people cannot be forced to testify against themselves
The basic rights that given by the constitution to its citizens prevent the Government from violating the things that should be had by humans in order to make our life valuable.
Example of basic rights: The right to live, the right to be free from torture and degradation, etc.</span>
The primary cause of the great schism was due to disputes over the authority of the pope. The Roman Pope claimed he held authority over the four eastern patriarchs, while the four eastern patriarchs claimed that the primacy of the patriarch of Rome was only honorary, and thus had authority only over Western Christians.
Though normally dated to 1054, when Pope Leo IX and Patriarch Michael I excommunicated each other, the East -West Schism was really a result of an extended period of estrangement between the two bodies of Churches.
