1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex73 [517]
3 years ago
8

Common Sense, Britian could not effectively rule the American colonies because

History
2 answers:
Sonja [21]3 years ago
8 0
The British allowed supplies to enter Boston. ... the British were forced to leave Boston. According to Common Sense, Britain could not effectively rule the American colonies because. there were big differences in religion.
gladu [14]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

the UK let the colonies have a lot of autonomy so when Britain lost the seven years war they wanted money from the colonies and couldn't do so because of the autonomy factor.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Whom did George Washington appoint as commander of the Patriot troops in the South? A) John Adams B) Thomas Paine C) Nathanael G
astra-53 [7]

George Washington appointed Nathanael Greene and commander in the South

Let me know if you need anything <3

X8lue83rryX

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Prime Minister of Japan in 1941 to 1944?
Ad libitum [116K]
 that would have been Hideki Tojo
5 0
3 years ago
“...daffodils; Beside the lake, beneath the trees, Fluttering and dancing in the breeze.” This is an example of which figure of
postnew [5]
C, personification because it gives the daffodils human characteristics (dancing).
4 0
4 years ago
A historical source can be deemed unreliable if the author appears to unfairly favor a particular side or view point
alisha [4.7K]
The correct answer is Bias.


A trustworthy source is one that passes factual
knowledge without much bias (where Bias
means holding an unfair or fallacious opinion). In
simple terms, Bias is giving preference for one
thing over another. A source is fully reliable if it
does not show bias. History is a subject where
people reveal their opinions, hence, we have to
be very cautious while going through history.
However, Bias in the source does not
automatically make a source untrue or incorrect.
Recognizing which side the source favors only
allow us to highlight the gaps in the information.
3 0
3 years ago
What was the U.S. response to the bombing of Pearl Harbor?
ExtremeBDS [4]

america declared war on japan and joined the allies

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What led to the sudden immigration to the west and what effect did the migration have on the United States?
    15·1 answer
  • Who was a colonist who provided the British with military information?
    13·1 answer
  • I have 1400/1000 points and 10/10 brainliest points.... Can someone please tell me why i'm not in Expert rank yet?
    14·2 answers
  • What effect did the Vietnam War have on Lyndon Johnson's presidency
    12·2 answers
  • What is a difference between oil and flour?
    13·1 answer
  • Which describes a similarity between abiotic and biotic factors? They may include things that were once living. They are both ne
    9·2 answers
  • What are two reasons president trump provides for avoiding taxes
    8·1 answer
  • What government agency is responsible for regulating the stock market?
    14·1 answer
  • CAN YOU PLZ HELP ME WHOEVER GETS THIS CORRECTS ILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST!!
    6·1 answer
  • What language did the early settlers of Acadiana primarily speak?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!