I could be wrong, but I think that a lot of Picasso's work has shapes trying to make something (he put shapes together in a way that make it look like something) while a lot of other Cubist art is more like the other way around where they try to focus on the shapes instead of what the shapes make together. So I would say that c. The figure is identifable would be the best answer. But I could be wrong because I don't see any pictures to compare. That's just what I think that his overall art shows. I hope that helps and that you didn't get an answer too late lol. Good luck with whatever you're doing!!! ^u^
Answer:
The umbra, penumbra and antumbra are three distinct parts of a shadow, created by any light source after impinging on an opaque object. Assuming no diffraction, for a collimated beam (such as a point source) of light, only the umbra is cast.
Explanation:
Answer:
I think the practice of restoring artworks is a very dangerous game. Artwork that has been around for centuries cannot be replaced and if they were to, somehow, get messed up during the restoration process then that is a large chunk of history that has been lost. However, I do believe that (if done right) artwork restoration can turn out beautiful as long as the person restoring the artwork is highly skilled and trained within this profession. Personally, I don't believe that the original artist's vision has been changed, just as long as nothing has been changed on the artwork (example: adding a bird or a tree to the painting that was not there before). In conclusion, if done right, art restoration can be a great thing but there is always the factor of danger added in.
Painting in the Renaissance was most commonly done as fresco, or murals painted onto plaster walls. For frescos, pigments were mixed with water and directly painted onto the wall. However, some artists did paint on wood using tempera paints, which are pigments that use egg yolk as a binder.
