Is the interstate commerce act a valid example of pure socialism?
No it is not. The reason it's not is this is that Socialism has to do with ownership of the means of production and distribution, which means how the surplus value generated by the means of production is used.
the Interstate Commerce act has nothing to do with socialism.
It is an example of government interventionism in a market-based economy. It did not attempt to change the method of ownership and allocation of surplus value in the railroad industry, nor did it attempt to introduce worker self-management.
The agora that I am thinking of is a market place.
Answer:
As war was inevitable, Japan's only chance was the element of surprise and to destroy America's navy as quickly as possible. Japan wanted to move into the Dutch East Indies and Malaya to conquer territories that could provide important natural resources such as oil and rubber.
Explanation:
The three suggestions included in the policy were:
- <span>Testing all applicants and recruits for drug or narcotics use
- </span><span> Testing current employees when performance difficulties or documentation indicates a potential drug problem
- </span><span>Testing current employees when they are involved in the use of excessive force or when they suffer or cause an on-duty injury.
all of these policies were created to make sure that employees' performances are not compromised due to the destructive nature of the narcotics.</span>
I believe the answer is c. Hope this Helps!!! :)
