Answer:
Failure at Gallipoli meant that the Allied powers where unable to knock the ottomans out of the war and close another front. This likely would have brought the Central powers to the negotiating table much sooner than it actually happened.
Interesting (unrelated) point: Winston Churchill spearheaded the invasion of Gallipoli
They are both separation of powers, checks and balances, and a bill of rights. There is a difference because one is for your state and the other is for your country.
The King has the greatest authority in a feudal system. He would own most of the land in the country and had the right to sell off land to the Barons, which were also very powerful and owned half of the land as well. In exchange, the king would get back military power and also loyalty from the Barons.
They were able to elect their own leaders
It was A of not I apologize
