Pedro I is best recognized as the man who announced Brazil independent from Portugal in 1822. The general population of Brazil, who had delighted in the privilege of being the seat of imperial authority, did not take well to returning to province status. Because of his father's advice and also his wife's advice, Pedro proclaimed independence on September 7, 1822 in the city of São Paulo.
Some of the similarities between the two revolutions were:
- Both revolutions began due to the ideas of Enlightenment.
- Many of their objectives were similar: freedom, equality, the end of tyranny, the rule of law, etc.
- Both desired a republican, democratic government.
- Both inspired many political changes across the world.
However, they were also significantly different:
- The United States was fighting against a different country (England), while France engaged in a civil war. This led to deeper divisions within French society.
- The United States already had a more egalitarian system, while French social classes were extremely rigid. Therefore, long-lasting change was more difficult to achieve.
- The United States was successful in remaining democratic and republican, while France struggled with various regime changes.
- The post-war period was relatively peaceful in America, while it was extremely bloody and violent in France.
Answer:
The correct answer is D) The British government.
Explanation:
This is a supremacist statement to justify British imperialist expansion and whose full context is the following "Ours is a superior civilization. Our laws, our industry, our values, and our religion have been a gift to the world for centuries."
Answer:
Missouri’s bid to become the first state west of the Mississippi River, and to allow slavery within its borders, set off a bitter debate in a Congress that was already divided into pro- and anti-slavery factions. During the debate, Rep. James Tallmadge of New York proposed an amendment to the statehood bill that would have eventually ended slavery in Missouri and set the existing enslaved workers there free. Southerners who opposed the Missouri Compromise did so because it set a precedent for Congress to make laws concerning slavery, while Northerners disliked the law because it meant slavery was expanded into new territory. Sorry I can't list everything this was an essay that I don't have anymore I'm just going off the top of my head.
Explanation: