1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Eduardwww [97]
3 years ago
6

PLEASE HELP!!!!!!

History
2 answers:
elena-s [515]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

I think it's B. Chocolate

Explanation:

Hope this helped :)

natta225 [31]3 years ago
5 0
It is chocolate
hope this helped!
You might be interested in
Think about what you know of the situation in Europe in the early 1900s.
Zepler [3.9K]

Answer: Nationalism, Imperialism, and Militarism were the three forces at work that helped set the stage for war.

Explanation:

hope that helps

6 0
3 years ago
Although horrific, the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was not reason enough for the United States to enter into World War II.
Anarel [89]
Hey!

 Your answer is false.

Although the war began with Adolf Hitler, the U.S ultimately did not decide to go to war until the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor.

Hope this helps! :)


8 0
3 years ago
Explain why world war 1 required total warfare
Paraphin [41]
Total warfare was when a country used any or all resources available for war and infrastructure as a ligament military target. This war far cause significant civilian or other non-combat deaths.They required this warfare because this would make it easier to win the war and also some never gave up with this type of war.
7 0
3 years ago
Was the Spanish-American War more positive or negative for the United States?
weeeeeb [17]
I cant quite put it, but lots of people died from each side.  I'm going to guess negative and here is my starting sentence.

The Spanish-American war was negative because lots of men, and women died from both sides.

I'm going to let you copy the sentence above for your TOPIC sentence.  I hope this helped, but you need to know the rest.
3 0
3 years ago
What does it mean to cause source biased? Why can bias<br> take away the credibility of the source?
vlada-n [284]

To cause a source to be biased means that it is influenced by your opinion or another factor that is not factual. Bias can take away from the credibility because it is not completely true, as a source should be.

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • These quotes illustrate a major difference between the northern and southern colonies what difference between the colonies is sh
    6·1 answer
  • The party in New York that tends to influence the Republican Party is the
    11·1 answer
  • Enter the word recieved when you completing the comparing the colonies online activity
    11·1 answer
  • What did egyptians develop the same year that india's early civilization began?
    10·1 answer
  • Jefferson's aim, as stated in his inaugural address, was to let the people regulate their own pursuits of industry and profit.
    11·1 answer
  • How many elephants were in hammurabi's troops when he crossed the alps alter ego?
    12·1 answer
  • How did great Britain try to control trade with the colonies and Europe
    12·1 answer
  • President Johnson's main objection to an 1866 bill extending the life and extending the powers of the Freedmen's Bureau Bill was
    11·1 answer
  • What is the meaning behind “did the Americans win the revolution or did the British lose.”
    6·1 answer
  • What role did Milliken's Bend play in the Civil War?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!