1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pie
3 years ago
8

Was American imperialistic growth consistent with democratic ideals?

History
1 answer:
givi [52]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The five main motives for imperialism include exploration, economic expansion, increased political power, the diffusion of ideological beliefs, and the spreading of religious beliefs and practices to others.

Explanation:

What were three reasons Americans supported imperialism? America had a military competition with other countries, economic competition with other nations, and a lack of concern for the people who lived in countries being taken over.

You might be interested in
Which pair of numbered statements best completes the chart related to
nikitadnepr [17]

Answer:

D

I got the question wrong, test reveled the answer and its D

7 0
3 years ago
In the 1700's what were Austria and Spain in conflict for ?
Luden [163]
They were in conflict with echother over a territory in Italy.trade rights in north America and the exspansion of Russia .
3 0
3 years ago
Underline the sentence that
Paul [167]

At first, he had the intention of attacking Clinton; however, he later changed his mind and decided to attack Cornwallis instead.

<h3>Who is General Washington?</h3>

Generally, When civilians who escaped the forces commanded by General Howe returned to their houses, they discovered that they had been pillaged.

It turned out that Washington was a greater commander than he was a military thinker. It wasn't so much his brilliance on the field of battle as it was his ability to hold the struggling colonial army together that made him so powerful.

His men had insufficient training and lacked essential supplies including food, ammo, and other provisions (soldiers sometimes even went without shoes in winter).

During the American Revolutionary War, General George Washington successfully led the American army to victory. During the Revolutionary War, Washington distinguished himself as a competent and resilient head of the American armed forces, despite the fact that he had very little experience in the actual management of big conventional armies.

Read more about General Washington

brainly.com/question/1957497

#SPJ1

6 0
1 year ago
The speech says, "A childhood friend once said about Mrs. Parks, 'Nobody
riadik2000 [5.3K]

Explanation:

THE PRESIDENT:  Mr. Speaker, Leader Reid, Leader McConnell, Leader Pelosi, Assistant Leader Clyburn; to the friends and family of Rosa Parks; to the distinguished guests who are gathered here today.

This morning, we celebrate a seamstress, slight in stature but mighty in courage.  She defied the odds, and she defied injustice.  She lived a life of activism, but also a life of dignity and grace.  And in a single moment, with the simplest of gestures, she helped change America -- and change the world.

Rosa Parks held no elected office.  She possessed no fortune; lived her life far from the formal seats of power.  And yet today, she takes her rightful place among those who’ve shaped this nation’s course.  I thank all those persons, in particular the members of the Congressional Black Caucus, both past and present, for making this moment possible.  (Applause.)

A childhood friend once said about Mrs. Parks, “Nobody ever bossed Rosa around and got away with it.”  (Laughter.)  That’s what an Alabama driver learned on December 1, 1955.  Twelve years earlier, he had kicked Mrs. Parks off his bus simply because she entered through the front door when the back door was too crowded.  He grabbed her sleeve and he pushed her off the bus.  It made her mad enough, she would recall, that she avoided riding his bus for a while.

And when they met again that winter evening in 1955, Rosa Parks would not be pushed.  When the driver got up from his seat to insist that she give up hers, she would not be pushed.  When he threatened to have her arrested, she simply replied, “You may do that.”

A few days later, Rosa Parks challenged her arrest.  A little-known pastor, new to town and only 26 years old, stood with her -- a man named Martin Luther King, Jr.  So did thousands of Montgomery, Alabama commuters.  They began a boycott -- teachers and laborers, clergy and domestics, through rain and cold and sweltering heat, day after day, week after week, month after month, walking miles if they had to, arranging carpools where they could, not thinking about the blisters on their feet, the weariness after a full day of work -- walking for respect, walking for freedom, driven by a solemn determination to affirm their God-given dignity.

It’s been often remarked that Rosa Parks’s activism didn’t begin on that bus.  Long before she made headlines, she had stood up for freedom, stood up for equality -- fighting for voting rights, rallying against discrimination in the criminal justice system, serving in the local chapter of the NAACP.  Her quiet leadership would continue long after she became an icon of the civil rights movement, working with Congressman Conyers to find homes for the homeless, preparing disadvantaged youth for a path to success, striving each day to right some wrong somewhere in this world.

And yet our minds fasten on that single moment on the bus -- Ms. Parks alone in that seat, clutching her purse, staring out a window, waiting to be arrested.  That moment tells us something about how change happens, or doesn’t happen; the choices we make, or don’t make.  “For now we see through a glass, darkly,” Scripture says, and it’s true.  Whether out of inertia or selfishness, whether out of fear or a simple lack of moral imagination, we so often spend our lives as if in a fog, accepting injustice, rationalizing inequity, tolerating the intolerable.

Like the bus driver, but also like the passengers on the bus, we see the way things are -- children hungry in a land of plenty, entire neighborhoods ravaged by violence, families hobbled by job loss or illness -- and we make excuses for inaction, and we say to ourselves, that's not my responsibility, there’s nothing I can do.

Rosa Parks tell us there’s always something we can do.  She tells us that we all have responsibilities, to ourselves and to one another.  She reminds us that this is how change happens -- not mainly through the exploits of the famous and the powerful, but through the countless acts of often anonymous courage and kindness and fellow feeling and responsibility that continually, stubbornly, expand our conception of justice -- our conception of what is possible.

Rosa Parks’s singular act of disobedience launched a movement.  The tired feet of those who walked the dusty roads of Montgomery helped a nation see that to which it had once been blind.  It is because of these men and women that I stand here today.  It is because of them that our children grow up in a land more free and more fair; a land truer to its founding creed.

And that is why this statue belongs in this hall -- to remind us, no matter how humble or lofty our positions, just what it is that leadership requires; just what it is that citizenship requires.  Rosa Parks would have turned 100 years old this month. We do well by placing a statue of her here.  But we can do no greater honor to her memory than to carry forward the power of her principle and a courage born of conviction.

(hope this helps can i plz have brainlist :D hehe)

7 0
3 years ago
The genocides in both Cambodia and Bosnia are examples of
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]

ethnic cleansing

Explanation:

  • Colloquially, genocide can be referred to as a number of crimes that cannot be classified under the legal definition of genocide
  • . Thus, the mass Khmer Rouge massacres in Cambodia in the 1970s, which claimed more than a million lives, are often called genocide, but they cannot qualify as one ethnic Khmer persecuting and killing other ethnic Khmer based on their social or political affiliation.
  • On the other hand, the persecution of ethnic Vietnamese and Muslims by the Khmer Rouge could be considered genocide, because the Khmer Rouge specifically attempted to destroy these groups, precisely because of their ethnic and religious characteristics.

Learn more on Genocide on

brainly.com/question/11276641

brainly.com/question/873379

#learnwithBrainly

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the right balance of power in good government???
    8·1 answer
  • Why did little of the free land offered by the Homestead Act end up being claimed by settlers?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of these is related to Social/Cultural History?
    11·2 answers
  • Which of these is not closely associated with germanys actions during world war 1 ?
    6·1 answer
  • Why did Lord North repeal the Townshend Act in 1770?
    12·1 answer
  • What help Julius Caesar gain political influence
    11·1 answer
  • You're over the age of 18, have been in the country for six years, and have learned English. What's your next step toward becomi
    8·1 answer
  • Please help!!
    6·2 answers
  • Why did Lucretia Mott and Elizabeth Cady Stanton decide to organize the Seneca Falls Convention in 1848? During an antislavery c
    10·2 answers
  • 1. Describe the North strategy to win the war?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!