Hello.
Why anyone would want an advantage for this, I don't know. It's nearly impossible to figure out any. Yet, I did. You're welcome.
Advantages:
✯ Everything would be harmonious, whether it be bad or good.
✯There would be no such thing as, "picky people."
✯There would be no arguments over social issues.
Disadvantages:
✯There would not be any variety that shapes communities.
✯Opinions would be virtually nonexistent.
✯Individuals would be prone to be controlled.
✯People's beliefs would be so similar that they'd become facts to them.
Answer: In this passage, Willis is expressing that literature is a message from the past telling us about the lives of those before us. We are told that these messages are trying to tell us how we live and how we die based on others experiences. Willis tries to explain this through a concerned, yet passionate tone that urges us, the readers, to learn from the mistakes and the fortunes of the lives of people before us. We can only do this through literature, as it is the gateway to seeing how the world works.
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer is A.
Explanation:
we begin with a testimony starting at paragraph A. Paragraph A then follows with an example starting at "well, my cousin was 5..."
then in phase II(body) we can then see him starting to make a lot of statistics that usually involve in people waiting for organ donations starting from paragraph 1.B all the way to paragraph 2.C.
it then ends with a narration at paragraph 2.D(2..) that quotes Robert Test's poem known as "To Remember Me."
It seems like A or B but more for the answer B
