Answer:
King explains the just and unjust laws.
Explanation:
In the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by 'Martin Luther King Jr.' wrote defending allegations against him. He explained his motive for the "Civil Rights movement" and why non-violent action was required for the movement to be successful. Dr. King wrote that the attitude of whites towards African Americans was hostile and he was fighting for their rights. He used rhetorical devices to claim that his actions are correct, and they are not illegal.
He said that disobeying one law doesn't means it is immoral. He justified himself that non-violent ways of protesting is legal as he says asks the question, “How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?".
The problem with Martin's request is that he is asking for too large an action.
<h3>What is a Conclusion?</h3>
This refers to the final statement that is used to close a narration or text after the analysis of other sources.
Hence, we can see that few people would be willing to donate such a large sum of money, based on a single speech. Martin can adjust his request; perhaps asking for a smaller donation or for members of the audience.
Read more about conclusions here:
brainly.com/question/24542637
#SPJ1
#1 : A. meanings of collective nouns
#2: (I am not too sure about this one but i think it's either A or C
#3: B. Define
#4: Some of these nouns are pretty amusing
Sorry for being 3 days late :(
Answer:
I would believe it to be 3 and 4.
Explanation:
I don't see why OSHA, the people dealing with work safety, would care about a conversation had along those lines....and citing a conversation as day-job experience just doesn't make sense to me.
Answer:
Which statement explains the reasoning and evidence used to support the claim that a principality created by the people is easier to rule?
Explanation:
The claim that a principality created by the people is easier to govern is a conclusion of deductive thinking, where the author has used evidence to substantiate that claim. These evidences must have been taken from historical facts, which prove that the conclusion is correct. In other words, we can say that to generate this claim, the author used an argument that uses deductive reasoning and logical evidence in the form of a historical example to support the claim.
Hope this was helpful
