Answer:
The previous government was democratic; Hitler was a dictator.
Answer:
It contributed elements of Confucian statecraft and popular Confucian religion, as well as Confucian ethics in family and personal relations, to the surrounding states.
After examining Jackson’s accomplishments compared to his shortcomings and controversies, it can be difficult to be unbiased when deciding if he should or should not be replaced on the bill. Many historians and scholars are in disagreement with each other on the topic. Some believe he should be featured on the back of the bill and not the front George Washington, the first president of the United States, appears on the $1 bill and was also a slaveholder like Jackson. Around 300 slaves lived at Mount Vernon when George Washington died. He also supported legislation upholding slavery and also opposed other legislation on slavery. He signed the fugitive slave act guaranteed a right for a slaveholder to recover an escaped slave. He also signed the Northwest Ordinance that recognized the Northwest territory and outlawed slavery within the territory. He never publicly denounced slavery as an institution, and there is no discussion of removing him from the $1 bill.
When taking a closer look at the behaviors of both George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, we can see that they share similarities with Jackson. If removing Andrew Jackson from the $20 bill is considered then so should removing Washington and Jefferson. However, Jackson is far too controversial, especially in recent years. He would be in the right spot if he was moved to the back of the bill, and someone like Harriet Tubman replaced him in the front. His accomplishments earn him his place on the bill, but his controversial actions lessen what he has earned which is why he should appear on the back. Especially compared to President Abraham Lincoln, who is featured on the $5 bill, Jackson should be featured on the back of the bill. Lincoln who had some of the greatest presidential accomplishments, like the passing of the 13th Amendment and the Emancipation Proclamation
Answer:
Nathaniel Bacon led other rebels against William Berkeley, the Governor of Jamestown because he felt marginalized and ill treated by the Governor who refused to retaliate against some native Americans who carried out series of attacks against farmers and other frontier settlers, nor grant him military commission or permission to fight and attack the native Americans.
Another major reason for the rebel against the Governor of Jamestown was because of his refusal to incorporate Nathaniel Bacon into his inner circle, and also refusing to allow Bacon and other frontier settlers the largess of trading in fur and other lucrative trades and commodities with the Native Americans.
Explanation:
The rebellion against the William Berkeley, the governor of Jamestown, otherwise referred to as Bacon's Rebellion took place between 1676-1677. The rebellion was led by Nathaniel Bacon who was the commander of the other rebels (Virginia frontier settlers). The major causes because the Virginia frontier settlers, particularly Nathaniel Bacon, felt marginalized and ill treated by the Governor who refused to retaliate against some native Americans who carried out series of attacks against farmers and other frontier settlers, nor grant him military commission or permission to fight and attack the native Americans.
Another major reason for the rebel against the Governor of Jamestown was because of his refusal to incorporate Nathaniel Bacon into his inner circle, and also refusing to allow Bacon and other frontier settlers the largess of trading in fur and other lucrative trades and commodities with the Native Americans.
They always had small pox
