1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Maksim231197 [3]
2 years ago
7

Soo does anyone know-

History
2 answers:
Ahat [919]2 years ago
6 0
Yeah I think it’s the last one too
Anon25 [30]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

I'm thinking it's the last one

You might be interested in
How did the make-up of the Roman Senate change over time?
vladimir1956 [14]

First it's important to think about the complications involved with the word “empire.” Rome was an empire (country ruling over other countries) before the first emperor, but the word derives from imperator, the name used by Augustus. But it meant “wielder of military power,” a kind of uber-general and was specifically not supposed to connote the idea of an emperor as we think of it today (the goal was to avoid being called a king or being seen as one). Earlier, Augustus was known as <span>dux </span>(leader) and also, later <span>princeps </span>(first citizen). As far as I know, in the days of the republic, Rome called the provinces just provinciaeor socii or amici, without a general term for their empire unless it was imperium romanum, but that really meant the military power of Rome (over others) without being a reference to the empire as a political entity. It didn’t become an empire because of the emperors, and the way we use these words now can cloud the already complicated political situation in Rome in the 1st century BC.

The point is this: the Roman Republic did have an empire as we conceive it, but the Senate was unwilling to make changes that would have enabled it to retain power over the empire. By leaving it to proconsuls to rule provinces, they allowed proconsuls, who were often generals of their armies whether they were actually proconsul at any given time or not, to accrue massive military power (imperium) that could be exerted over Rome itself. (This, by the way, is in part the inspiration behind moving American soldiers around so much—it takes away the long-term loyalty a soldier may have toward a particular general.)

So the Senate found itself in no position to defy Caesar, who named himself the constitutional title of dictator for increasing periods until he was dictator for life, or Octavian (later named Augustus), who eventually named himself imperator.

The Senate had plenty of warning about this. The civil wars between Sulla and Marius gave plenty of reason for it to make real changes, but they were so wedded to the mos maiorum (tradition of the ancestors) that they were not willing to address the very real dangers to the republic that their constitution, which was designed for a city-state, was facing (not that I have too many bright ideas about what they could have done).

To finally come around to the point, the Senate went from being the leading body of Rome to being a rubber stamp on whatever the imperator wished, but there was no single moment when Rome became an empire and the Senate lost power, and these transformations don't coincide.

For one thing, the second triumvirate was legally sanctioned (unlike the informal first triumvirate), so it was a temporary measure—it lasted two 5-year terms— and the time Octavian spent as dux was ambiguous as to where he actually stood or would stand over the long term (in 33 BC, the second term of the second triumvirate expired, and he was not made imperator until 27). When he named himself imperator, he solidified that relationship and took on the posts of consul and tribune (and various combinations of posts as time went on).

If we simplify, we would say that the Senate was the leading body of Rome before the first emperor and a prestigious but powerless body afterwards, though senators were influential in their own milieus.

One other thing to keep in mind is that Octavian’s rise to Caesar Imperator Augustus Was by no means peaceful and amicable. He gets a reputation in many people’s minds as dictatorial but stable and peaceful, but the proscriptions of the second triumvirate were every bit as bloody and greedy as those of Sulla. Ironically, it was Julius Caesar who was forgiving to his former enemies after he named himself dictator. Augustus did end widespread killings and confiscations after becoming imperator, but that was only after striking fear into everyone and wiping out all his enemies, including the likes of Cicero<span>.</span>

6 0
3 years ago
Plez help larasel will give brainliest I
kupik [55]

Answer:

Federalism is a mixed or compound mode of government that combines a general government with regional governments in a single political system. Its distinctive feature, first embodied in the Constitution of the United States of 1789, is a relationship of parity between the two levels of government established.

Explanation:

Your answer would be D or 4th answer

3 0
2 years ago
While direct democracy and representative democracy are both forms of rule ‘by the people’, representative democracy also involv
shtirl [24]
Hey there!

The ancient Greeks used direct democracy, and we use representative. The difference is that first of all, with a direct democracy, the opinions of the people directly affect the outcome of the decision being made. Those eligible to vote voted in assemblies, and the response of the majority ruled.

Here- it's a bit different. We use representative democracy- meaning that we elect representatives to vote and speak for us on the behalf of the people.

There's our difference right there. A direct democracy - like I said is where decisions directly affect outcomes, as opposed to where representatives are elected on behalf of the people to make laws and represent their voters and territory.

Your answer is C.

Hope this helps!
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Renting v. Owning a house (differences)
Gwar [14]

<em>Basically, when you rent a house it's like staying in a hotel. You pay to live there and use the amenities. When you own a house, you still have to pay bills and all that, but the property is yours to live on.</em>

Renting a home is when you pay a certain amount of money to stay in that home for a certain amount of time, while owning a home is when you have purchased a house as property.

When renting a property, there is a Landlord and the Tenants. The landlord owns the property and is renting it out to the tenant(s). The tenants pay rent to the landlord in exchange for living there.

When you are paying rent you will have to pay for:

- monthly rent

- security deposit

- utilities- electricity, water, garbage, etc.

- renter's insurance

When you own a property, you must pay for:

- monthly mortgage payment

- down payment (one time cost)

- closing cost (one time cost)

- utilities, garbage, water, etc.

- homeowner's insurance

- real estate property taxes

- maintenance

uhhh, yeah, hope this helps a bit? ^^

Attached are some images that might provide easier info.

4 0
2 years ago
Who is Joseph brant
rewona [7]
Joseph Brant was like <span>associated with </span>Great Britain<span> during and after the </span>American Revolution<span>. Look him up and do some research. It's not that hard to do research, you can't expect others to do it for you. :)</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was one result of the GI Bill?
    14·2 answers
  • What was the reason for Italy's wealth?
    12·1 answer
  • The population rate rose most quickly around. The population had its first significant change between. Based on the data, we can
    10·2 answers
  • How were the political structures of the Jamestown and Plymouth colonies different?
    6·2 answers
  • Family planning is a service that assists couples in
    11·1 answer
  • How did the British differ from the French in their relations with Native American tribes?
    15·1 answer
  • A main result of bacons rebellion was that
    11·1 answer
  • Hi lol. sjcnksjdjjjj
    8·2 answers
  • 6. The currency of the European Union is the a. Euro b. Franc C. Mark d. Lira.​
    11·2 answers
  • What did Huey P. Newton accomplish in his time?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!