Answer:
True
Explanation:
It is TRUE that the cause of the Indian wars in the Pacific Northwest was mainly caused by broken treaties, which led to many deaths and Indians being forced into small reservations.
This is evident in the fact that the American government in their bid to use the land occupied by the native Americans in the Pacific Northwest of the United States or even any other area in the region, ask the native Americans to move to a new reservation with a promise of no trespassing on their lands or reservation.
However, many times, the US government tends to break this treaty, and war always eventually occurred as a result.
Answer:
Explanation:
Although the south is somewhat like the north, it had many different features. Climate – colds winters; hot/humid summers, there winters were long cold and snowy.
Well even though im not gigivng you the two paragraphs you need, I can give you information on two of the cases so that you can write about them: <span>McCulloch vs. Maryland: "The power to tax equals the power to destroy" -- The state of Maryland attempted to tax the Baltimore branch of the Bank of the United States (federally-created) -- Confirmed the legitimacy (in Marshall's opinion) of the Bank of the United States, thus upholding Congress' use of the elastic clause. Also further emphasized Article VI (Supremacy Clause) that the states had no power to tax a federal institution. Clearly defining that federal law/power trumps state.
Gibbons vs. Ogden: Federally issued permit vs. State (NY) issued permit to navigate waterways around New York. Marshall court re-emphasized Article VI (Supremacy) stating that federal law trumps state AND this decision further emphasized the Commerce Clause stating that commerce was not defined solely as the buying and selling of goods, but the transportation thereof as well. Establishing that only the national Congress had the ability to regulate INTERstate trade, further strengthening the federal government over the states. Hope this works for you.</span>
Answer:
C.He wanted to attract other people to move there.
I think that the federal courts rule over state disputes because there needs to be an unbiased third party making unbiased decisions, unbiased rulings. An example would be if California and Colorado disputed over rights of water to the Colorado River, the federal court would intervene.
