The point was that it was negotiation for two parties, they would force interaction between eachother to get an advantage in the negotiation over the other.
Explanation:
Example: this was used as a policy in the US to coerce the Soviet Union into backing down militarily.
President Jimmy Carter based his foreign policy views on human rights. He ended US foreign aid to abusive US allies and was tough on other allies that abused human rights of their citizens.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option C.
Competition and inequality are necessary for human advancement.
Explanation: Andrew Carnegie was one of riches business man in USA during after 1800. He was the owner of the Carnegie steel and one of best seller of steel in the USA and around the world. He had $13.1 billion when he sold his business.
Besides,being a businessman he was a renowned philanthropist and business philosopher. In 1889, in an article titled "Gospel of Wealth" he mentioned about the Law of Competition which was written by himself. He said,"While the law may be sometimes hard for the individual, it is best for the race, because it insures the survival of the fittest in every department."
Though his statement, he tried to support his theory about law of Competition. Because he believed that competition makes the mentality to serve the best. When there is any inequality, it inspires someone to gain wealth and balance the rich poor difference.
So, according to the business philosophy of Carnegie " Competition and inequality are necessary for human advancement" describes his philosophy.
The standard of living is improved through something called "comparative advantages", which means that, relative to the nations' total output and ability to make other things, each nation produces something that they're better at making than the other. When the nations trade, they are able to use these comparative advantages to create a more efficient, productive economy.
Even if one nation is wealthier or better off than the other, this principle means that both countries can still become better off through trade.