Answer:
<em>To evaluate the effectiveness of an argument the reader needs to check if the read and evidences of the author are true and if the logic used in the argument is valid.</em>
Explanation:
The effectiveness of an argument will depend first in the premises, if they are true or false, in this stage you should check sources, facts and evidences to see how reliable is it. The second stage is to check the logic applied, many arguments had false reasoning, which make then invalid or what it is called logic fallacies. If an argument is valid but the premises are not true it won’t be an effective argument, is the premises are true but the logic applied is not correct it won’t be an effective argument too.
Answer:
fewer, new, and pay-per-view
Explanation:
fewer describes people, new describes source, and pay-per-view is for basis
Answer:
A
Explanation:
When you have a summary you start your transition with For Exsmple.
The choice that best describes an effective rebuttal to an argument is
- C
. It explains why evidence to support the argument is insufficient.
An effective rebuttal of an argument is one that counters an argument and states that which the arguer believes is the correct reasoning.
Any piece of evidence that has been provided to support the argument is disproved and the opposer states reasons why he believes that it is not true.
Conclusively, the option that describes the most effective rebuttal to an argument is C
. It explains why evidence to support the argument is insufficient.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/21320891
The Yes Men focus their hoaxes on big corporations to gain the attention of the public as well as showing that they care for their customers.
I hope this is the answer you were looking for and that it helps!! :)