<h2><em>Every day when I was a kid I’d drop anything I was doing, no matter what it was—stealing wire, having a fistfight, siphoning gas—no matter what, and tear like a blue streak through the alleys, over fences, under porches, through secret shortcuts, to get home not a second too late for the magic time. My breath rattling in wheezy gasps, sweating profusely from my long cross-country run I’d sit glassy-eyed and expectant before our Crosley Notre Dame Cathedral model radio</em></h2><h2><u><em /></u></h2><h2><u><em>HOPE IT HELPS </em></u></h2><h2><u><em>THANK YOU </em></u></h2>
Answer:
This is FALSE.
Explanation:
Each piece of writing does have a title or sub-title. But, it is not correct to infer the context of the piece based purely on the title. Because the whole text would provide more detailed information on the given heading. It would elaborate different or related aspects of the given title.
So, to properly understand the whole writing, it is not correct to conclude the meaning of the writing depending solely on what the title is.
Answer:
options 2 and 5 make the most sense to me
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I think the best thing to do is summarize the main ideas,this way the readers will remember your argument.
I hope this helps
