Answer:
Can you show us the sentence???
Explanation:
Answer:
Phones should be allowed in school because if the school does not have enough Chromebooks, students can use their phones. Furthermore, phones can help save the school from limited access to technology and save the school from wasting money. For example, if students do not have a Chromebook for a science class, they can use their phones to work on their science class. It can also help people communicate with each other, including something during an emergency. For example, parents can call their children to see where they are, how they are doing, what is going on in school, etc. That is a beneficial thing. Lastly, phones are useful for taking pictures of very long or detailed notes. For example, if a teacher writes much information about a physics unit and the student does not have enough time. The student can take a picture of the notes and move on quickly. After that, once they get home, they can write down all the notes that the teacher wrote. With that, it can help students efficiently. That is the last reason. Some people say that phones make students get distracted from learning new things. For example, a student might listen to music during class with a phone and not listen to the teacher's attention. If that happens, the teacher can take away their phone and give them back at the end of class. Some people also say that some students misuse their phones by doing something else instead of doing their school work. For example, using social media, However, if that happens, then the teachers can take the student's phone and give a warning at first. If the child still misbehaves like this, they can send the student to the office, then call their parents and tell them everything.
Explanation:
Hope it helped!
Answer:Fatty Legs: A True Story is the 2010 autobiographical account of author Margaret-Olemaun Pokiak-Fenton’s childhood experience in one of Canada’s residential schools for Indigenous children in the 19th and 20th centuries. This study guide is based on the 10th anniversary edition, in which several supplemental chapters written by Pokiak-Fenton’s daughter-in-law explain the larger context of colonialism that created the residential school system. These residential schools represented an attempt to strip Indigenous students of their cultural identities and supplant their Indigenous educations and upbringings with the English language and cultural markers of “Western” (White-European-influenced) cultures.At eight years old, Olemaun Pokiak (her birth name) left her home on Banks Island, within the ancestral homelands of her Inuvialuit community (the Inuit people of the Northwestern Arctic in present-day Canada) and went to the residential Catholic school in Aklavik, on the mainland. Intimidation, humiliation, abuse, and suffering marked Margaret-Olemaun’s schooling experience. Her recollections match the patterns of thousands of other residential school students who have published accounts or given interviews of their time in residential schools across the continent (a similar system extended through the U.S. and was marked by the same assimilation mission and abusive treatment of pupils). The title Fatty Legs comes from a nickname that other students used to torment Margaret-Olemaun author after a cruel nun made her wear unflattering bright red stockings while the other girls wore gray. The story of the two school years, however, is ultimately one about triumph, perseverance, and resilience.In a report produced by Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission—a government body created to collect data on residential school history and educate modern Canadians on the past and present effects of misguided assimilationist policy—the commission determined that the residential schools constituted “cultural genocide.” While the system and concurrent policies diminished Indigenous populations, ignored tribal sovereignty, and damaged Native communities, Indigenous peoples and their diverse cultures managed to survive, even if they were altered by outsiders. Told in the voice of an Indigenous protagonist, the book offers readers a first-hand account of historical anti-Indigenous racism and a story that exemplifies how the targeted populations adapted, resisted, and retained their cultures and identities.
Explanation:
The text also states that Sandy's parents did not want their daughter to become a teenage bride. This is why they sent her to Florida to live with her grandmother.
We also learn that Soda did ask for Sandy's hand in marriage. Hope this help plz brainliest
