the demand curve for the bonds shifts to the left and the interest rate rises
when the market is volatile , then the risk associated with the bond is very high . there is an inverse relation ship between risk and demand. when the risk is high, the demand for the bond decrease and the demand curve shifts to the left. also there is an inverse relation ship between the demand and interest rate. hence, when the demand decrease , the interest rate on the bond rises
the explanation for correct option because of an inverse relationship between the risk demand and demand interest rate, the interest rate cant fall when the demand curve shift to the left and when the risk is high , the demand curve shifts to the left only, not to the right .
Learn more about demand curve here.
brainly.com/question/28203108
#SPJ4
Answer:
The risk premium appropriate for this security is 4%.
Explanation:
The returns vary by only half as much as the market index which means that the security half as risky as the market.
The risk-premium for the security should be half of the market risk premium.
Market risk premium is calculated by = Expected return on the market - Risk free rate
Market risk premium = 13% - 5% = 8%
The risk premium on the security would be 8% / 2 = 4%
If i understand your question properly, you want to determine how much each partner wiil have based on the sharing ratio.
Answer:
Alex- $40,000
Brad- $30,000
Carl- $30,000
Explanation:
For a net loss of $100,000 shared between partners in the ratio 4:3:3, the value of each partner's ratio can be calculated as seen below.
Step 1: Add the ratios
i.e; 4 + 3 + 3 = 10
Step 2: Calculate the value of each ratio in $100,000 using te formula
(ratio value ÷ total ratio) × $100,000
For Alex, we have
(4 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.4 × $100,000
= $40,000
For Brad, we have
(3 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.3 × $100,000
= $30,000
For Carl, we have
(3 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.3 × $100,000
= $30,000
N.B: To confirm if the value of each ratio is correct, you can add up the values to see if it makes $100,000. If it doesn't, then the calculatio is wrong.
Adding the value of the ratios, we have $40,000 + $30,000 + $30,000 = $100,000.
i hope this helps
Answer:
Owing cash on credit accounts doesn't really mean you're a high-hazard borrower with a low credit Score. Notwithstanding, when a high level of an individual's accessible credit is been utilized, this can show that an individual is overextended, and is bound to make late or missed installments.
The amount owed on different accounts decides 30% of the FICO score. Aside from the general amount owed, the FICO scores think about the amount claimed freely on explicit accounts. On the off chance that you utilize a noteworthy part of the credit you are qualified for, it can negatively affect the FICO scores. Be that as it may, utilizing a less amount from as far as possible allowed can give you a superior score than not utilizing the credit by any stretch of the imagination.
