The correct answer is answer C ("The article will be biased because the historian is using only one source about the ruler").
If a historian only took this one scroll to write a biography on its subject (the ruler), it would most likely be extremely misleading and inaccurate. There's no way of getting closer to the truth of any subject without contrasting a variety of opinions from different sources. What if people working for this ruler wrote it in a way that made him look good? What if it was written under pressure? What if it was a complete lie? These and many other questions should come to mind as possible ways in which relying on one source might compromise historical facts.
Hope this helps!
Answer: imposing taxes on them without their approval or representation.
Explanation: King George III is considered by many to be the mentally unstable King of England from 1760-1820. The colonists were torn between loyalty to the crown and resistance because of the way he wanted to govern the affairs of the colonists and he was largely considered a tyrant.
The colonists were very angry towards king George as regards the Townshend acts which was taxation without representation as well as the taking away some of the colonists' freedom. The acts were called duties but the colonists said they were indirect taxes and were levied on imported materials like glass, lead, paint, paper and tea.
Because america had better living condition
While including the typical barons and knights, Simon de Montfort had also included burgesses (originally a freeman of a borough) from influential towns.
