√(- 9 ) / (( 4 - 7 i ) - ( 6 - 6 i )) = 3 i / ( 4 - 7 i - 6 + 6 i ) =
= 3 i / ( - 2 - i ) = - 3 i / ( 2 + i ) =

=
- 1 - 2 i
Answer:
^(3)+7x^(2)+4x-12
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is: x² – 6x + 9 = 0 .
_____________________________________________________
Explanation:
________________________________________________________
Given: (x – 3)² = 0 ; write as: general form: "ax² + bx + c = 0"; a ≠ 0 .
<span>
Note: </span>(x – 3)² = (x – 3)(x – 3) = x² – 3x – 3x + 9 = x² – 6x + 9 ;
___________________________________________________
Rewrite: (x – 3)² = 0 ; →
as: x² – 6x + 9 = 0 ; which is our answer.
____________________________________________
→ x² – 6x + 9 = 0 ; is in "general form", or "standard equation format"; that is: " ax² + bx + c = 0 "; (a ≠ 0) ;
→ in which:
a = 1 (implied coefficient, since anything multiplied by "1" is that same value);
b = -6;
c = 9
_______________________________________________________
Answer:
Fraction form- 2/5
Decimal form- 0.4
Step-by-step explanation:
Distribute.
Have a good day!
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.