Answer:
Anglo-Saxon culture that it was important to risk your life to win battles, especially battles for revenge of loved ones. The big mother presents this aspect of Anglo-Saxon culture because she risks to fight and avenge her son's death.
Explanation:
The Anglo-Saxon heroic code put the battles on a level of high importance, for them the battles were more important than life itself. This intensified when the battle was aimed at avenging a relative or a friend. For the Anglo-Saxons a true warrior would risk his own life if it meant getting revenge for vile acts that someone committed with his loved ones.
Grendel's mother is a strong example of this concept, as she sets out to fight the powerful warrior who killed her son to avenge him. She knows that the warrior can kill her too, but she prefers to risk her own life so that her son can be avenged.
Is this how to kill a mockingbird?
Answer:
An argument relies on a comparison of two things
Explanation:
Many arguments rely on an analogy between two or more objects, ideas, or situations. If the two things that are being compared aren’t really alike in the relevant respects, the analogy is a weak one, and the argument that relies on it commits the fallacy of weak analogy.
Analogy: a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.
Hi!
The answer that makes the most sense in the situation is:
We decided to take the path <em>around beneath the lake</em>.
I know that this is kind of confusing, but if you don't overthink it, it makes sense.
I hope this helped!
I know that the person in the comments said this, but I thought I could try to explain it a little bit.
God bless,
Sofia
I would think she was hearty it sounds like..
