I) The Reconstruction Era and the 1950s and 60s weren't as different as they should be. With different degrees, racism and segregation persisted in XXth century America. African-Americans still couldn't fully exercise their rights as the whites did theirs, and they still suffered violence from white supremacists and authorities.
II) The differences rest in how African-Americans in the 50s and 60s were better mobilized and prepared to defend themselves and fight for their rights. Despite continuous racism, in the 50s and 60s there was more space and sources from which racism could be fought against. There was NAACP, for example, and many public figures famous for fighting racism.
III) From this comparison, we see that one of the Reconstruction's successes was the foundation for legal disputes in favor of African-Americans rights, like the 14th Amendment and the 15th Amendment that provided the legal basis to fight racism and to expand African-americans rights. As for Reconstruction's failures, it didn't dismantle racist structures in the South and didn't succeed in changing culturally how black people were seen, leaving space for racism in its many forms like lynchings and segregation.
The correct answer should be
<span>the country would be divided
It was believed that Lincoln would be the last president of the US because the Confederacy would secede and form their own country so there would no longer be the United States of America. The fear of division was never stronger than at that period in time.</span>
Ill try to join okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
I assume this question is asking true or false
Answer
True
Explanation:
This is President Clinton's January 20, 1993 Inaugural Address after defeating incumbent President George H. W. Bush and ending 12 years of Republican leadership in the White House. He talks about change and renewal. In the quote, President Clinton explains the new government's approach to international politics, stating the need for peaceful resolutions to problems over war when it is possible and the need to go to war if all other alternatives fail.
<u>Ethiopia defeat Portugal to stay independent:</u>
The Abyssinian-Adal(Ethiopia & Portugal) War was a military conflict between the "Ethiopian Empire and the Adal Sultanate" that took place from 1529 to 1543. The Abyssinian troops included the Amhara, Tigrayan, and Aegay ethnic groups. The Adal army consisted mostly of Afar, Harari, Somali with Argoba forces.
In the process both politicians exhausted their resources and manpower, resulting in a contraction of both powers and changing "regional dynamics for centuries" to come. In 1529, Imam Ahmad's contingents defeated a large amount of Ethiopian contingent at the "Battle of Shimba Qir". The victory came at a huge cost, but it strengthened the morale of the Somali army, providing evidence that they could stand with the Ethiopian army at large.
500 Muscatiers were led by the Bahri Negassi Yeshak, the king of Medri Bahri. Not only did Yasakh provide the Portuguese with provisions and places to camp within their scope, but also informed them about the land.
