Answer:
In both the New England and Chesapeake regions, English colonists established settler colonies based on agriculture, in contrast to French trading posts in Canada. These settlements were based on some form of agriculture and had some measure of self-sufficiency, especially in New England. For example, permanent settlements were established at both Jamestown in the Chesapeake and Boston in Massachusetts Bay. The economies of the New England and Chesapeake colonies were very different. The New England colonies had a more diverse economy which included shipping, lumber, and export of food crops. On the other hand, the Chesapeake colonies' economy focused almost exclusively on the production and export of tobacco and a few other cash crops. This focus on cash crops fostered a need for slave labor in the Chesapeake. As a result, more enslaved Africans went to the Chesapeake than New England. The New England climate and terrain was not suitable for growing cash crops like tobacco. A plantation economy did not develop in New England because plantation crops would not grow. In the Chesapeake, however, the soil, weather, and flat terrain were excellent for tobacco growing. Had the climate of Virginia been more similar to Connecticut, it’s reasonable to say the two colonies would have been very similar. The sharp contrast in the climates and terrain accounts for much of the difference in the development of the two regions.
Answer:
The reason that South Carolina was founded was to provide money to the king, land to the Nobility, and goods to the Empire. Also, South Carolina was heavily dependent on rice and other crops while North Carolina was dependent on lumber so they were split in 1729.
It helped the textile industry because now we could make twice as much in half the amount of time.
Answer:
The method of presenting history is different from that of other sciences. Even so , history uses the scientific method at every stage, namely, while looking for collecting evidence , examining the evidence and while putting it together. When required , help is also taken from other sciences. That is why , history is considered to be a scientific discipline.History is not written solely on the basis of imagination.
Explanation:
This is acurate answer.
