1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andriy [413]
2 years ago
7

Which is a conclusion you can draw based on BOTH passages?

English
2 answers:
elixir [45]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:d

Explanation:

romanna [79]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

D GIVE BRAINLIEST PLZ

Explanation:

Got it right

You might be interested in
And roll of thunder hear Me cry who struck who in the face​
otez555 [7]

Answer:

Hmm?

Explanation:

Is this a question or no because i don't understand it...

3 0
3 years ago
“To build a fire” commonlit answers!! Please I need your help!!
Keith_Richards [23]
Building a fire is an act of technical skill and technology, and fire in literature has also often been used as a symbol of knowledge. The building of a fire thus symbolizes life in the story, but also life through human knowledge, skill, and technology.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A commercial that compares dry skin to a desert is using which literary device?
Anettt [7]
Metaphorical language
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was A Raisin in the Sun important for its time?<br> real answer no links
Tamiku [17]

Answer:

A Raisin in the Sun was a revolutionary work for its time. Hansberry creates in the Younger family one of the first honest depictions of a Black family on an American stage, in an age when predominantly Black audiences simply did not exist.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Which sentence from the passage best shows that the debate was a parliamentary debate? At yesterday’s debate, tensions were hi
damaskus [11]

The sentence from the passage that best shows that the debate was a parliamentary debate is:  The Taft team went second, making a strong counterclaim, but their argument didn't have as much supporting evidence.

A parliamentary debate is held in academic settings and it originated from the British Parliament. In a parliamentary debate their are two sides who have their own points and support them with evidence.

In the chosen option, we see that the Taft team had a counterclaim. Even though they were making an argument, they did not have a supporting evidence.

This shows that they were engaging in a parliamentary debate that they were not properly prepared for.

Learn more about parliamentary debates here:

brainly.com/question/1695492

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • why are the slaves too fearful of mr.covey?why does their work go on in his absence(Frederick douglas study guide)
    6·1 answer
  • Which situation best exemplifies the theme of power in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar?
    6·2 answers
  • Read the following sentence: The sun's rays caressed the plants that were drooping from the heavy rains. To change the tone of t
    14·2 answers
  • Write an argumentative essay in which you argue whether democracy is profitable to everyone in society or not. Use inequality as
    7·1 answer
  • you are the secretary of students council of delhi public school , new delhi . you are organising an excursion to manali. write
    9·1 answer
  • What were times Uriah had to be honest hittite warrior. plz help i will give brainliest ​
    7·1 answer
  • A group of lists titled United States History, table of contents. The first list is labeled Unit 1, Colonial America with entrie
    8·2 answers
  • Why does malala’s father say circumstances have made wise beyond her years?
    12·1 answer
  • There are many toxic things in e-cig vapor
    11·1 answer
  • Why did the correctional officer change his attitude towards Stevenson?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!