The answer is B/2
hope this helps
Answer:
Most of the states in ancient India were politically stable. They often remained for long periods free from internal squabbles and intrigues of the kind we see today. This situation helped them a great deal in initiating measures aimed at improving the quality of life of the common people. How could the states enjoyed political peace for long stretches of time to undertake such measures? The answer is that the origin of the state in ancient India was strongly believed to lay in dharma (religion) itself and, therefore, treated as an institution not to be opposed or disobeyed.
A close study of the scriptures of ancient India reveals that the people during the Vedic and later periods firmly believed that the state had been set up by god Himself. One of the India, Kautilya, held the view that God created the state for administering a benevolent yet strict rule over the people. Manu, the famous lawgiver, said that the state was needed to enforce discipline in the life prone to act in unrighteous ways.
Explanation:
The correct answer is Option A: because people of the world- including dissenters in Germany- has approved their cause.
Joesph Stalin justified the war of Soviet Union with Hitler's Germany because he believed that everyone was on his side. He believed the world had approved his cause to fight tyranny.
He also believed many Germans did not like Hitler and were also supportive of his cause.
We should not forget that the people of Soviet Union were already supporting Stalin.
Answer:chinese workeys will work for long hours for lower wages than moust western workers and this statement among the followin is negative aspect of american and european consumerusm the correct option among all the options that are given in the question is option c. i hope it help you
Explanation:
I think the check and balances system work really well in united states.
This system prevent the government from becoming too tyrannical because it separate our government into legislative, executive, and judiciary branch.
If, one government handles all these three, the government could basically violate the law and directly change the law after that so it wouldn't be considered a crime
