How did Lincoln’s approach to Reconstruction differ from the approach of the Radical Republicans?

History

1 answer:

KonstantinChe [14]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The Radical Republicans opposed Lincoln's plan because they thought it too lenient toward the South. Radical Republicans believed that Lincoln's plan for Reconstruction was not harsh enough because, from their point of view, the South was guilty of starting the war and deserved to be punished as such.

You might be interested in

After world war 1, the japanese military

olga_2 [115]

Reasserted its power and began aggressive military expansion. Hope that helps!

5 0

3 years ago

Which argument best supports the idea that the electoral college should be eliminated

Sladkaya [172]

This is a system set up by the founding fathers, people would want to stick with the passed down, original tradition.

It also gives low-population states a say in federal government where higher population states might overwhelm them, if its possible to that is. Plus, in my opinion at least, popular vote is pretty much useless

3 0

3 years ago

What was the major appeal of Buddhism?

OLEGan [10]

Answer: It was believed to bring about an end to suffering

Explanation:

After Siddhartha Gautama gained enlightenment and became the Buddha, he preached to many to make them understand that suffering existed in this world but there was also a way to end it, following the Eightfold Path.

In a world that was beset with suffering, the people readily took this message in because they wanted their suffering to end and they believed that Buddhism could make this happen.

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which president issued an executive order in 1948 that required the integration of the u.s. armed forces?

Nastasia [14]

That would be answer D. :>

7 0

3 years ago

"No village or individual shall be compelled to make bridges at river banks, except those who from of old were legally bound to

yawa3891 [41]

Answer:

The correct answer is A. Individual rights.

Explanation:

It is called "individual rights" to the prerogatives and rights that individuals have in a society governed by the rule of law. Thus, these individual rights grant guarantees and protections to people, in order to safeguard their freedoms and respect the basic principles of social order, limiting the actions of the government and its use of force against its inhabitants.

Thus, in the case, the right of individuals not to be forced to build bridges is granted, granting them a guarantee of protection against the actions of any authority that intends to breach said rule.

6 0

3 years ago