1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lidiya [134]
3 years ago
6

How did Lincoln’s approach to Reconstruction differ from the approach of the Radical Republicans?

History
1 answer:
KonstantinChe [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The Radical Republicans opposed Lincoln's plan because they thought it too lenient toward the South. Radical Republicans believed that Lincoln's plan for Reconstruction was not harsh enough because, from their point of view, the South was guilty of starting the war and deserved to be punished as such.

You might be interested in
Should the United States Have Annexed the Philippines?
rusak2 [61]

Answer:

The U.S. should have annexed the Philippines because it would’ve given us a larger sphere of power and influence. However, you could argue this larger sphere of power is bad because this is what got the Spanish in the conflict in the first place, the more land they occupied, the more revolutions from the people, and the annexation of the Philippines did in fact cause a revolt and a more deadly one, 4,200 Americans and over 20,000 Filipino soldiers were killed, and 200,000 Filipinos civilians were killed from famine, disease, and violence.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
If someone is great at philosophy pls help
Mumz [18]

Answer:

look for a quizlet there very usefull

5 0
3 years ago
About a Indian fight for independence from the British empire he claims that the movement was successful mostly because of its n
Scilla [17]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

The Indian fight for independence from the British empire received such strong support not only in India but from other countries, for teh fact that its leader, Mahatma Gandhi, decided to base the Indian Independence movement on non-violent acts.

So we can say that a big part of the success of the movement was due to the non-violence approach and tactics of its leaders.

As happened in the past, if a violent approach would have been taken, the English king could easily have sent soldiers and special troops to quickly ending with any fight or rebellion. So Gandhi really knew that a war was not a real option and many Indians could have died on the battlefield with not a real chance of winning the war.

So the nonviolent approach was the smartest decision he could have made.

5 0
3 years ago
Water that flows downhill along Earth's surface is called
andrew11 [14]
C.runoff because  it is going downhill and the water is already on a base
3 0
3 years ago
The pullman strike and the homestead strike were both ended when
Lerok [7]

Answer:

The pullman strike ended in 1894

The homestead ended in 1892

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • The English philosopher John Locke wrote that
    15·2 answers
  • Detail things that martin luther king was known for
    5·1 answer
  • Which one of these characteristics did all of the first wave of immagrants have in common
    13·2 answers
  • In a direct democracy, who decides government matters? a. all the people c. elected representatives b. women d. the king
    5·2 answers
  • What happens if you break the rules for war?
    14·2 answers
  • Edmond Cartwright invented a method of weaving cloth using the power of water.
    10·2 answers
  • PLS HELP QUICK, MARK BRAINLEST <br> explain how Texas gained strength after its defeat at the Alamo.
    6·2 answers
  • What were some Obstacles Reginald Lewis faced ?
    10·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME ASAP ILL GIVE BRAINLEST
    11·1 answer
  • What was the primary significance of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!