Excuses can ruin true communication if it becomes a habit because it can cause the person on the receiving end to see you as not persistent, not a promise keeper, not a person who follows through with what they say, etc.
Boasting can ruin true communication if it becomes a habit because it can cause others to dislike you. If you brag and boast all the time about things or people you have/seen and others haven't, it can turn people sour. For example, if I kept bothering you about how my computer was better and newer than yours, you wouldn't like it would you?
Always apologizing can ruin true communication if it becomes a bit because it can be so repetitive, people may become suspicious. They might not know when you're actually sincere about your apology, or whether you're just saying sorry again out of habit.
Answer:
A = She is upset because she realizes that she craves love, not life in the city.
B = "For she knew now that it was not the great city and its crowds of people she had so eagerly sought; but the pleasant-faced boy, who had made her picture that day under the mulberry tree."
Explanation:
Answer:
If an infant fails to establish sustained respiration after birth, the infant is diagnosed with asphyxia neonatorum
Answer: C) The author proves that he's biased when he uses terms like "silly" and "stupid."
Explanation: The words "silly" and "stupid" are the only instances of evidence among the options, since they were taken directly from the text that is being discussed. The closest example of bringing the text's content into the discussion is in option C (stating what the author has expressed), but that option doesn't present any conclusion. Option A is presented as a personal opinion with a vague origin ("I feel") and option B tries to back the presented conclusion with an assumption ("the author obviously hates [...] fast food") instead of evidence.
