Answer:
Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
Variable costs = $28
Allocated fixed costs = $17
Selling price = $84
Due to acceptance of M offer, S would be got excess contribution margin per unit. Because acceptance selling price ($34) is greater than the variable cost per unit ($28).
We don't have any information about the fixed cost due to acceptance. Therefore, we assumed that fixed cost is not increased.
Increased contribution margin per unit:
= Selling price - Variable cost
= $34 - $28
= $6
For 3,000 units, Increased contribution margin = 3,000 × $6
= $18,000
Therefore, net income is increased by $18,000 when the offer is accepted.
Answer:
the income is $1,330
Explanation:
The computation of the income is shown below;
Given that
U(x, y) = min{x, y2}
Price of x is $25
ANd, the prcie of Y is $15
So,
25X + 15Y = M
if Y = 7,
So,
At eqm, X = Y^2 = 49
Then ,
M = 25 × 49 + 15 × 7
= 1225 + 105
= 1330
Hence, the income is $1,330
The same should be relevant and considered too
Might seem controversial though :) but I am pretty sure that the correct variant that properly shows the converse of given statement is the third one. As you know, the converse (in plane language) has the same meaning of the statement just by replacing two points. This statement has positive tone (if you make - you ll have) so it's directly coincides with C(you have, cause you have made)
Answer:
The incremental cost is $198,000
Explanation:
Given;
Current cost per unit to manufacture = 66,000 units
Direct materials = $5.00
Direct labor= $9.00
Overhead = $10.00
Total cost per unit = $24.00
Incremental costs = $1,254,000 - $1,056,000 = $198,000
I think Jennifer’s payment for the month is 3,800
