1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jarptica [38.1K]
3 years ago
8

I NEED HELP PLEASE

History
1 answer:
Ivan3 years ago
7 0
Christmas tree it 9/10 or use quizlet.com it helps a huge ton when brainly doesnt have the answer kay? sorry im no help thou i tried
You might be interested in
Why did Christianity spread more than Judaism? *
AnnZ [28]
It was believed by more people in comparison to Judaism
5 0
3 years ago
Was the declaration of independence written in the late 1900s or 1700s?​
Nonamiya [84]

Answer:

It was written in 1773 so late 1700s

7 0
3 years ago
“The people of Europe who are defending themselves do not ask us to do their fighting. They ask us for (weapons)... which will e
vesna_86 [32]
c) provide military aid to the Allies without sending troops

The quoted speech, from December 29, 1940, is referred to as Roosevelt's "Arsenal of Democracy" speech.  The great "arsenal of democracy" was American industry, revving up to provide needed supplies for the Allies to assist them in fighting for freedom.
5 0
4 years ago
What were the arguments for "precision" and "area" bombing in World War II? Which one do you think was the better strategy? Why?
babunello [35]

Answer:

Bombing in World War II

Explanation:

World War II was an advanced military war that fought in Europe. Many advanced military weapons used in war. The bombing was one of the techniques which caused destruction and deaths in larger areas. Precision bombing related to well-defined targets like a military base, aircraft factories, and oil refineries. Area bombing related to specific areas like cities or industrial areas where citizens also reside in the location.

The best strategy is precision bombing which destroys the targeted areas without losing civilians lives.

 

8 0
3 years ago
How did new england settlers justify taking over indian land?
Rufina [12.5K]

Answer:

The Indians made no use of it,

Explanation:

Puritan minister in Boston justifies the colonists' acquiring Indian land for little to no payment. “The Indians made no use of it,” he asserts, “but for Hunting.” own Blood to drink, in lieu of what they had most barbarously shed of their Neighbour

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the effect of Japan's self-imposed isolation?
    14·2 answers
  • How did the scientific revolution of the 17th century lead to the industrial revolution?
    15·1 answer
  • Why did the lakota and the kiowa tribes keep a "winter count"?
    12·2 answers
  • what did churchill mean when he said that instead of being forced to ''snatch''his ''victuals'' from the table ,''Hitler had ''t
    10·1 answer
  • According to this document how did the homestead act encourage the settlement of the war?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did Galileo's support of the heliocentric theory cause conflict with the Catholic Church? what was the outcome?
    11·1 answer
  • What is Newton’s first law?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did British set up a colony in 1783 ? Please help ASAP !!
    12·1 answer
  • HELPPPPPPP PLZZZZZZZ
    9·1 answer
  • In greek mythology what is the relationship between zeus and hermes.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!