1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
blondinia [14]
3 years ago
14

Who would have benefited more if the Missouri Compromise had stayed in effect?

History
2 answers:
Rudik [331]3 years ago
7 0
A is the answer to this question
sattari [20]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The South because they would have gained more States which meant more Slaves.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which of the following is true about fossil fuels?
Ostrovityanka [42]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When massachusetts refused to renounce the letter written by samuel adams and james otis in 1768, great britain responded by?
kap26 [50]
The letter signed by Samuel Adams caused very negative reactions in the British, which increased tensions between the British Parliament and Massachusetts, who not to give up what the letter said, led the British Empire to decide the occupation of the city of Boston by the British Army. This fact, in turn, and given the repressive forms of reaction of the British, was a fact that rushed and provoked the American Revolution. It should be noted that in the letter, it was expressed at the end that the settlers were still subjects of His Majesty and that only expressed with anguish their problems.
8 0
3 years ago
The U.S. government's actions in the late nineteenth century particularly targeted immigrants from?
tigry1 [53]

Answer:

I

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
After Europeans realized the Americans were not Asia, their motives
PtichkaEL [24]

Answer:

changed

Explanation:

Originally, the European led by Christopher Columbus wanted to go to Asia via westward routes in order to trade in silks and spices. However, following their realization that, America is not Asia, their motives CHANGED from trading to exploitation, exploration, and colonization of the land. Instead of trading, they wanted to establish a colony and claim the territory.

Hence, in this situation, the correct answer is that their motives CHANGED

5 0
3 years ago
ALUIEN QUE ME AYUDE A REGISTRARME EN GOKANO
bogdanovich [222]
Can you explain to me what gokana is 
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the rights of citizens change in the Philippines after Fredinand marcos was elected president
    13·1 answer
  • What two groups fought the civil war,<br> and who led them?
    10·1 answer
  • Whose discovery of radium changed the world's view of the atom?
    5·1 answer
  • Why did Joseph II believe that religious tolerance was a benefit to the state?
    12·1 answer
  • In what ways did the experience of moving west alter traditional expectations of women's roles'
    9·2 answers
  • "For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended Offenses" How did the forefathers address the colonial grievance abov
    15·2 answers
  • How did the South respond to President Johnson's reconstruction plan?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the Russian revolution begin in England ?
    10·1 answer
  • What was a major emphasis during kangxis rule in china
    5·1 answer
  • Question 6(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!