Answer:
In the late 1950s and early 1960s conservatives were widely dismissed as "kooks" and "crackpots" with no hope of winning political power. In 1950 the literary critic Lionel Trilling spoke for a generation of scholars and journalists when he wrote that "in the United States at this time liberalism is not only the dominant but even the sole intellectual tradition.... It is the plain fact [that] there are no conservative or reactionary ideas in general circulation" but only "irritable mental gestures which seem to resemble ideas." The historian Richard Hofstadter echoed Trilling's assessment, arguing that the right was not a serious, long-term political movement but rather a transitory phenomenon led by irrational, paranoid people who were angry at the changes taking place in America.
Explanation:
For the answer to the question above, <span>Germany would be very poor, Germany would start another war in order to seek revenge or other nations unhappy with the peace terms would be starting to age new wars. I hope this helps. Have a nice day!</span>
The differences are that Magna Carta<span> was made to set rules and give rights to the nobility, royalty, and other high-ranking officials of that time, and the </span>Constitution<span> was written to give rules and rights to all people.</span>
They also wanted India to have its own government, in which men like them would become MPs. The Indian National Congress first set out these ideas in 1885. ... Also, India was so valuable to Britain that they were reluctant to lose too much control. By the end of the First World War in 1918 British rule was still secure.
