Change it into improper fraction to make it easier or just solve it as is.
=

-

=

-

=

=
OR
=

-

divide it to two parts:
3-2=1 and

-

=


⇒(1×8-2=6)
=

=
Hi.
To formally answer your question:
D. y = 0.75<em>x</em> + 11
We can prove this by substituting <em>x</em> with 1 (the initial measurement)
y = 0.75(1) + 11 = 11.75
~
It is more than just a quadrilateral. In fact it is going to be hard to pick.
These facts suit a square, a rectangle, a rhombus, and a parallelogram. And the above statement is true, but maybe a little harder to prove than the converse of the statement, which is the usual one you find.
The converse is "If you have a parallelagram, the diagonals bisect each other."
You might think a trapezoid deserves some mention. The diagonals of a trapezoid do not bisect each other.
I really do not know the answer to this question
I have seen you ask this question twice before, so I will give you the answer that HugoD gave you:
In mathematics, "of" is translated as a multiplication.
So, you have :

.