1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kipish [7]
3 years ago
5

Stephen F. Austin was used to being able to speak his mind in the United States, but Mexico didn't have the same type of freedom

of speech in their country. In your journal, discuss whether or not you feel Americans today take our rights and freedoms for granted.
History
2 answers:
MakcuM [25]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Stephen F. Austin was used to being able to speak his mind in the United States, but Mexico didn't have the same type of freedom of speech in their country.

I feel Americans today take their rights and freedoms for granted because they were born with these rights and do not appreciate the value of it.

Although in those years of Stephen F. Austin's time, freedom of speech was not like the one in the United States, today México and other Latin American countries indeed have the same freedom of speech as the democratic countries they are.

The difference is that the American people have forgotten the cost of having that freedom of speech in the United States Constitution. They do not have in mind the many wars the nation has fought and the many deceased people in those battles that fought for liberty and the freedom of speech.

Gnesinka [82]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Yes, I feel like Americans today take our rights and freedoms for granted because, in this situation, most people are lost because they usually go outside mask free and meet up with friends and hug and touch each, but now they can barely see them, so yes I feel like Americans take our rights and freedoms for granted.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What was the goal of the Espionage Act of 1917?
irina1246 [14]

Answer:

The correct answer is  option 3:<em>To make it illegal to say anything against the government. </em>

Explanation:

The Espionage Act of 1917,  was to make it illegal for people for people to say anything offensive, disloyal or abusive language about their country and their goverment,

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think the United States should stop playing a role in world affairs
castortr0y [4]

Well, the moment the US intervened with the affairs of the World was the moment that the US could not go back to an isolationist policy. The US simply cannot afford to stop playing a role in world affairs, due to the fact that the US is a capitalist society and that the US has a lot of exports/imports. Unless the US can reach a level of capacity where it is self sufficient, which is currently impossible to do, the US must participate in the affairs of the World in order to survive.

7 0
3 years ago
Briefly explain how one of the presidents described in this section defined or exercised the powers of the presidency
IceJOKER [234]

Explanation:

Theodore Roosevelt mobilised the public behind his policies and utilises his cabinet.

8 0
3 years ago
Should the federal legislature be able to repeal state laws in order to impose federal laws for the purpose of promoting the gen
padilas [110]

The federal legislature or congress can repeal the state laws under the necessary and proper clause in order to impose federal laws necessary to provide general welfare and common defense of the nation because they have the authority to do so. This authority was given to them because the people believed that the congress would decide for the common good.

Moreover, only the federal legislature has the right to contract debts, lay taxes and if they believed that a state law may prevent the collection of a federal tax, then they can repeal state laws making sure that it is for the benefit of the United States.  


4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write two testimonials for your civilization from real or fictional people.
timama [110]

Answer:

fiction is the right one

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are your thoughts on Hiroshima? which do you think was more in the wrong?
    5·1 answer
  • Why do you think the Americans and
    5·1 answer
  • What was the significance to the 36 to 30 parelle
    7·1 answer
  • Sorry about the photo quality but I need help now plz I am haveing a terrible time
    6·1 answer
  • In Oklahoma, what percentage of land is used for agriculture?
    12·2 answers
  • In the 1950s, the United States became especially concerned about Latin America counties because
    6·1 answer
  • Which event did Hitler blame on the communist party?
    11·2 answers
  • Who would be most likely to contest USMCA?
    12·2 answers
  • Who was nebuchadnezzar ii and what did he do
    15·2 answers
  • Match each story detail to information about it
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!