First of all, I think you mean "a part". To be "a part of a community" means that you are a member of a social group or circle. To be "a part of a family" means you are a member of a family. However, when you do not include the space between "a" and "part" and simply use the word "apart" the meaning is changed and the sentence is grammatically incorrect. The word "apart" implies that you ARE NOT a part of whatever you are talking about. However, if you want to say that you are "APART" and that is the word you mean, you would say "APART FROM a community" or "APART FROM a family" meaning you are different than the community/family.
I hope this makes sense!
Good luck!
Direct observation. This is because the anecdotal fallacy is a logical fallacy and says that isolated events are not adequate pieces of evidence. It must be a well-documented case to be evidence.
The last sentence is correct, because the other ones either had periods in the middle or too many commas in them.
1) "... the distance of Hawaii from Japan makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks ago... [during which] the Japanese Government has deliberately sought... [false] hope for continued peace."
2) "The attack yesterday on the Hawaiian Islands... American ships have been reported torpedoed..., [and] yesterday the Japanese government also launched an attack against Malaya.. Last night Japanese forces attacked the Philippine Islands..."
The first excerpt shows that Japan gave the US a false sense of hope by saying they are reigning in their expansions and hope to continue to have peaceful relations with the United States. The second excerpt then shows what Franklin was talking about, in that they used the 'guise of peace to backstab the US in hopes of continuing their expansion eastward.
Answer:
I think it is the first one
Explanation:
I am very sorry if it is wrong
