Answer: Self-esteem
Explanation:
Self-esteem is a person's overall personal value. This defines the answer to the question.
The Harlem Renaissance was lead by many people and it was not really a one-person movement, but You can definitely mention <span>W. E. B. Du Bois as the leader or one of the leaders of the Harlem Renaissance. </span>
I believe 1 is Mathematics
I believe 2 is 100,000
I believe 3 is profits
I believe 4 is B.
5 is definitely FALSE!!
Hope this helped!! :D
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
Answer:
Because if his basic needs are not fulfilled he can't focus on learning and he does not have the motivation to do so.
Explanation:
Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs states that in order for an individual to succeed, he/she has to have their needs satisfied.
This is best represented by his Pyramid of Needs; in order for an individual to pass to the next stage, he/she has to have the basic needs fulfilled.
In this case, since the child comes to school hungry and without a coat, it can be deduced that his physiological needs (water, food, clothing) are not met, thus he cannot go on to the next stages in order to pass the grade.
