In a group discussion the following sentence would be the best example of synthesizing claims and evidence:
B. Since her acting was so bad and the man she loved controlled so much of her life, it's possible that Molly felt she deserved to be spoiled.
Synthesizing claims and evidence refers to summarizing the discussion and stating the main conclusions or thoughts. Therefore, posing questions would probably start or continue the discussion rather than synthesizing it (option A). On the other hand, synthesizing claims and evidence is not compatible with stating one's personal opinion about the topic (option C). Finally, statement D introduces the discussion rather than synthesizing it.
The answer is C). The group of clueless tourists needs to purchase a map.
The subject here is "group", a singular noun, thus our verb also needs to be singular (i.e. "needs"). To check if we have subject-verb agreement, remove the "of clueless tourists" phrase and see if it the sentence would make sense.
"The group needs to purchase a map."
<em>Hope this helps.</em>
Answer:
A candle
Explanation:
The longer you have the candle the smaller it becomes because the wax melts making the candle shrink.
An analogy is a comparison of two things. You can even make graphs to compare the two things, this is an example of an analogy.
The food talked to me as I chewed it.
