Answer:
Both developed and developing countries have had significant negative impacts on the environment.
Explanation:
The environment has been very badly affected by human activity. The negative effect has been present for a very long time, progressively becoming more and more serious, but since the start of the Industrial Revolution it has exponentially increased and the effects have been horrific. While there are differences between the impact of developed and developing countries, the fact is that both have had significant negative impacts.
The now developed countries were actually the first ones to start with massive impact on the environment, which was a result of the usage of fossil fuels, rapid economic growth, and constantly growing demand for natural resources. The developing countries have started off later with their massive impact, but it has had the same results. While the developed countries are turning a page and try to be as environmentally friendly as possible, that is not the case with the developing countries that try to become developed. To put it simply, The forests that were destroyed in the UK several hundred years ago are not getting back, and the forests that were recently destroyed and still are getting destroyed in Indonesia will not just come back, at least not with the current trends.
well i can say for sure that it dose not steadily increase. the troposphere gets colder as you ascend so its the exterior temperature slowly decreases. (apex)
Answer:
C. Fair weather.
Explanation:
If your talink about warm/cold fronts.
The correct answer is - A. Electricity.
Russia is a country that has an abundance of natural resources, and it uses them in order to produce its own electricity, and does it multiple ways. As one of the countries that has developed nuclear programs from long time ago, Russia has also used this technology in order to build nuclear reactors for the production of electricity. Also, the country has numerous rivers that are very large in every aspect, so lots of hydroelectric capacities have been built in the dams for production of electricity. The fossil fuels are also used on a big scale, and the usage of coal and mazut in the generators for producing electricity is still big.
The reason why the Midwestern United States have a very fertile soil, but Canada doesn't, despite both of them being covered by glaciers until relatively recently, and both having the same age of soil, is the climate and vegetation.
Canada is much colder than the Midwest, its winters are longer, and the summers mild, while the Midwest has higher temperatures, prolonged period of drought, and seasonal rainfall.
Because of this, Canada has been covered by coniferous forests. They leave relatively little biomass, and also the climate is making the decomposition of the biomass very slow, thus resulting in relatively poor soil quality.
In the Midwest, the climate is perfect for the development of the grasslands. The grasses grown and die each year. They live a lot of biomass, and the higher temperatures contribute that the biomass decomposes pretty quickly, thus resulting in good quality soil.
