One major idea in the memoir "No Gumption" by Russell Baker is that of adaptability. In this excerpt, his mother is convinced that the author's future is that of business, and she pushes him towards trying harder and harder to succeed. Although he tries to do it for a long time, he does not have the talent or the interest necessary to succeed in that area. The mother, however, is adaptable, as she changes her mind in light of new evidence. When the author's teacher praises his work, his mother examines it, and when she agrees, she realizes that maybe her son's skills are better used in a different area. This is exemplified by the line: "Nothing more was said about it immediately, but a new idea had taken life in her mind". This sentence shows that the author's mother can reexamine her assumptions and create new ideas based on new evidence, which is the mark of adaptability.
Answer:
Poe begins with an unambiguous definition of the purpose of poetry: A poem deserves its title only inasmuch as it excites, by elevating the soul. ... It has been assumed, tacitly and avowedly, directly and indirectly, that the ultimate object of all Poetry is Truth.
They should avoid doing a plan betrayal or plans to kill. Hope this helps
The answer is A
B should be:
Do you need help with the printer?
C should be:
In the fall, I am planning to take piano lessons.
D should be:
You have a friend in me.
Answer:
The police were not fair.
Explanation:
Edward Coolidge was being accused of murdering a 14-year-old girl. He was the last person the girl was seen with and with whom she kept in touch before being found dead, stabbed and with gunshot marks on her body. How Coolidge was the prime suspect in the crime.
The police needed to go to Coolidge's house to search and seize his car and other objects that could be used in the investigation, for that, the police needed a search and seizure warrant. Who signed the search and seizure mandate was the Attorney General of the case and for that reason, the arrival of the police at Coolidge's home was not fair and violates the fourth institutional amendment.
This is because, for a term to be valid, it must be issued by someone who holds an impartial position in the case investigated.
