Answer:
To swear an oath of brotherhood
Explanation:
The three rioters swore an oath to kill death but greed took a tow on them and they ended up killing each other because of eight bushels of gold they each wanted for their vices.
Answer:
She is torn between telling the truth and being loyal to her family.
Explanation:
In "Diary 33," the author faces a tough choice. While she valued loyalty to her family, she would never knowingly help put an innocent person behind bars. Both of her principles were challenged, but only one could be satisfied given the circumstances she found herself in. The author's deep love for her mother shines through in this difficult moral situation. The resolution revealed that her mother inspired her to speak out, even if it meant betraying her gang's trust.
- This is just my opinion; feel free to alter it as you see fit.
The above question wants to assess your ability to read and interpret speeches. In that case, I can't write the text for you, but I'll show you how to do it.
First, you should read Nixon's and Ford's speeches. In this reading, you should identify the objective of the speeches, that is, what Nixon and Ford want to achieve with the themes and topics presented in their speech.
Once you recognize these goals, you can write your text as follows:
- Introduce the main subject of your text.
- Show the objective of Nixon's speech and how that objective is developed during the speech.
- Show the objective of Ford's speech and how that objective is developed during the speech.
- Compare Nixon and Ford speech objectives, show similarities and differences.
- Also, compare the development of this theme and which development was most efficient.
- Show which speech was most likely to achieve the goal.
More information:
brainly.com/question/2285439?referrer=searchResults
The answer would be A. The reason for this is it is the most likely answer. old people makes no sense. a retirement home has nothing to do with the question and work over the years does not correctly define legacy.
Claudius goes on to bribe Hamlet's friends and while they do protest they end up accepting anyways in hope of helping their friend. I belive that would be considered justified.
