Answer:
Because the host discovered it was futile to keep talking with the guest.
Explanation:
This is a very common behavior after the subject identifies a strong limitation between dialogue. It points out ignorance or the lack of ability to observe a phenomenom from a different perspective. Therefore it is very difficult to create a debate without any bias between both. It is frustrating because the person unable to analyze the phenomenom from another perspective will die to let you know that he or she is correct. But it is because of his or her inability to see the event far away from his or her centered point of view.
Answer: I do not know if this is a multiple choice question or not, but I would contend that through his numerous science works he broadly influenced modern science and sparked the interest, and even the fascination, of the public in the subject.
Explanation: American writer and university professor Isaac Asimov (1920-1992) wrote and edited hundreds of science-fiction and popular science books (and also books on many other topics) for the broad public, which made science and technology more accessible and understandable, and changed the way people thought about those disciplines. His view of robots was particularly influential: he humanized them and contributed to their depiction and their profusion in public culture.
If you check back in a week, then I will have a better schedule.
Answer:
Difficult and painful
Explanation:
Sarah's life was full of struggles as her parents died and only left with her siblings.
Explanation:
i think it's the 3rd one because it doesn't sound like the title is talking about his career. it sounds like it's talking about him personally
***but i have never read this article so just go with your gut feeling!****
