Answer:
The Haunted Forest
Once upon a time there was a family, made up of two young ones and their parents, traveling by road to road. One day the car broke down in the forest. The parents went out to get help, and so the children would not get bored, they left them with the radio on. It turned night time and the parents still did not return. Then suddenly they heard the disturbing news go on in the radio: A very dangerous killer had escaped from a prison near the forest. Hours passed and the children's parents did not come back. Suddenly, they began to hear something really loud. ¨Bang, Bang, Bang¨. They heard that which seemed to come from something hitting the top of the car. Then, the sound became louder and louder every time. ¨BANG, BANG, BANG¨. The terrified children could no longer resist. They opened the door and ran in a hurry. Only the eldest of the children dared to turn his head to see what caused the loud noise. He should have not done it though, there was a large and scary man on top of the car, who hit the top of the vehicle with something on his hands, they were the heads of his parents! The children began to run even faster and the large man began to run towards them. The children ran into the forest and so did the large man. After that day no one ever saw those children ever again, and who knows, they may appear mysteriously next to you.
Hope this helps!!
Explanation:
CAN I PLEASEEEEE GET BRAINLIEST
Answer:
From the given sentence and question, no verb is highlighted, but from the sentence, "If the speaker had been on time, the program would have begun on time", you can see that there is tautology as the word "on time" is used twice in the sentence when it could have been used only once.
Therefore, to correct this tautology, the sentence can be rewritten as: "If the speaker had been on time, the program would have begun early".
As a result of this, there is no incorrect verb form in the sentence, so it is safe to assume that the highlighted verb is correct.
The answers are choices 1,3, and 5 for anyone else looking.
Answer:
The best support that line 7 can have for arguing the need for paper is that the only technologies available to replace them that doesn't tire the eye are incredibly expensive.
Explanation:
There are two reasons for this argument. the first one is that blue light is very damaging for the human eye. It creates a syndrome called "tired eye" it means that the eye gets tired and can't watch properly. So with time internal eye pressure increases and can cause glaucoma. Now, there is only one type of technology available for replacing paper without affecting the human eye with blue light. It is called electronic ink. It works by printing real-time images on the screen with electronic ink. Something similar to LCD. However, this technology is really expensive and has not been used to the widescreen market. One single electronic ink monitor of 13 inches without HD capabilities, working at 30 or less fps costs one thousand dollars as a minimum. therefore, the paper is still needed as books' average cost is ten to twenty dollars.
